Answer:
cross-sectional study
Explanation:
Dr. Milano compares the performance of a group of 20-year-olds, a group of 45-year-olds, and a group of 70-year-olds on several tests of fluid intelligence and several tests of crystallized intelligence. Dr. Milano's investigation BEST exemplifies a <u>cross-sectional study</u>. A cross-sectional study is a type of observational study that analyzes data from a population, or a representative subset, at a specific point in time, it involves the use of different set of people who differ in the trait of interest. For example, the effect of age on intelligence level will involve the selection of subjects across the cross-section of ages of interest.
I believe that the answer is BUSINESSES.
The scenario that is explained is an example of necessity of compromise.
- Equality before the law means that everyone is equal and there should be no one who sees himself or herself to be superior to others. The same law is applicable to everyone.
- Majority rule implies that the political decisions should be made by the majority of the people in the group.
- Individual worth and dignity imply that people should be treated with respect.
- Necessity of compromise means that people can agree to a particular thing but understanding themselves in order to achieve a goal.
- In this case, in order to fund the construction of the new highway, the citizens agreed to a minimal increase in taxes.
In conclusion, the correct option is C
Read related link on:
brainly.com/question/22268081
The correct answer is the increasing demand for the new consumers of the goods. The prosperity of the United States in the mid-1920s resulted in part form the increasing demand for the new consumers of the goods. The higher the demand, the more financial percentage there is.
A major cause of the Pequot War and King Philips War were b)disagreements between Indians and colonists about land use and ownership. Many of the settlers wanted to use the land to live there with their families and wanted to trap animals to eventually sell them for fur-trading purposes, while the Native Americans saw it as their historical land where generations had lived there for years and wanted to continue to live there.