1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Fiesta28 [93]
3 years ago
11

Polybius believed that the Roman Republic would last forever, because it fused together aspects of monarchy, aristocracy, and po

lity. What were the chief factors that let to its demise in the first century B.C.E.? Could these have been avoided? If so, how?
History
1 answer:
Kisachek [45]3 years ago
6 0

Answer and Explanation:

The fall of the Roman empire was mainly due to the barbarian invasions, division between West and East, the economic crisis and the growth of Christianity. This fall may have been avoided if, instead of political disputes, the citizens involved used their time and their intellectual capacity to solve the problems that were arising in the region, mainly the economic crises and the constant and overwhelming invasions that were defusing the empire. increasingly stronger. In addition, the suppression of power disputes would have prevented the division between West and East, in addition to allowing a beneficial and harmless transition to the Christian religion.

You might be interested in
What was the main reason why congress passed the indian removal act?
Rasek [7]

To relocate Native Americans to the east of the U.S.A's territory

5 0
3 years ago
The Athenian ruler who is credited with establishing the democratic system of governmen
Mazyrski [523]
Solon (around 590 BC), Cleisthenes (508 BC), and Ephialtes (462 BC) contributed to the development of democracy. Usually, the establishment of democracy attributed to Cleisthenes, since the laws of Solon were <span>abolished</span> by Pisistratus and Ephialtes just improved some settings of Cleisthenes.

I'm greek, so I hope I've helped you.
6 0
3 years ago
Why is history open till I’m going in changing interpretations
stepan [7]

Answer:

e) Traditional interpretations are questioned by revisionists.

Explanation:

History is always open to ongoing and changing interpretations due to the revisionists questioning of the interpretations of the traditionalists. In addition new evidence can become available, or differing conclusions are drawn from prior research.

im pretty sure this is the answer. Hope this helped.

4 0
3 years ago
What did loyalists believe in?
Gennadij [26K]
Loyalist believed that it was their duty to follow the King's laws and rules, so what ever law the King and they would follow it with out a question
3 0
3 years ago
What are two different perspectives of the American Revolution?
S_A_V [24]
The American Revolutionary War was a war fought between Great Britain and the original 13 British colonies in North America. The war took place from 1775 to 1783 with fighting in North America and other places.
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why were so many enslaved Africans brought to the southern colonies
    10·1 answer
  • The mycenaeans traveled approximately how many miles to reach Knossos, Crete, from Mycenae
    5·1 answer
  • Which two things did former British prime minister Winston Churchill affirm in his iron curtain speech
    9·2 answers
  • During the high middle ages monastaries were considered religious centers as well as
    13·1 answer
  • In the late 1930's, the number of Jewish refugees rose after Germany annexed
    13·2 answers
  • What are the good and bad protests about marijuana laws?
    7·1 answer
  • 5. Which is not an example of a third party?
    14·2 answers
  • Is an ordinance the same as a law
    15·1 answer
  • This world-famous Spanish artist was known for Guernica the old guitarist the blue period and cubism?
    10·1 answer
  • List the first 10 amendments in the Bill of Rights​
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!