She either had $0.52 or more because it doesn’t say how many erasers she got
Step-by-step explanation:
(1 point)
No, there isn't a more efficient way to solve this system.
Yes, a more efficient way is to multiply the first equation by 4, add to eliminate y, then solve for x.
Yes, a more efficient way is to multiply the first equation by −4, add to eliminate y, then solve for x.
Yes, a more efficient way is to multiply the first equation by −4, add to eliminate x, then solve for y.
Answer:
I don't know, I kind of wonder the same thing sometimes. But everyone understands things at a different rate, so that's why I'm here helping people by answering their questions and doing my best to explain how I got there.
thank you for the free points though :)
The expression is (42*7) + (14+22)
Answer:
99
Step-by-step explanation:
102F down by 3F would be 99 and it says then. Then would be the 'two hrs later'.
