1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Maru [420]
3 years ago
10

Read the following historical perspectives from two modern-day historians. Which of the following explains why Historian A menti

ons the issue of slavery while Historian B does not?
Historian A:
The American Revolution was caused by the American colonists’ greedy desire for more money. They were simply tired of paying their fair share of taxes to the British government, even though British troops protected the colonies during the French and Indian War! Furthermore, their claims to be fighting for freedom and liberty are totally wrong. Many of the colonists still owned slaves at the time of the Revolution! The traitorous American colonists simply wanted to steal land that was already claimed by Great Britain.
Historian B:
The American Revolution was completely justified due to Great Britain’s repeated abuse of the colonists. The British passed enormous taxes on goods in the colonies, even though the Americans had no say in the British government. British soldiers were also allowed to live in American houses and eat common people’s food without paying. During the Boston Massacre, British soldiers even fired their muskets into a crowd of civilians! Under such oppressive conditions, it’s no wonder that the patriotic colonists would want to fight for the freedom and liberty of all people!
A. Historian B wants to make the British appear to be disinterested in American affairs, including the terrible institution of slavery.
B. Historian A wants to make the colonists appear in a negative light by suggesting that they did not really believe in freedom for all.
C. Historian A is using slavery as a metaphor to argue that the American colonists have treated their British leaders poorly.
D. Historian B is making a purely economic argument, so there is no need for him to mention the institution of slavery.
History
1 answer:
Ket [755]3 years ago
8 0
The answer is b historian a clearly has a thing against colonists

You might be interested in
What was the name given to low-cost, multifamily dwellings in the cities in the late 1800s? A. Apartments B. Projects C. Tenemen
White raven [17]
<span>During the industrialization of the United States in the 19th century, immigrants were housed in old houses or warehouses, which were bought and divided to be distributed among the families. These buildings did not meet all living standards completely, for example they were very hazardous in the case of a fire, but they were enough for the families trying to earn a living for themselves. These low-cost dwellings were referred to as tenements.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Many Southerners were pleased by this decision because it said _____.
Ostrovityanka [42]
The answers is C.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.





8 0
3 years ago
Which best explains how the change by Palestinians from violence to negotiation affected their case for independence?
mr Goodwill [35]

Answer:

A) It made the case stronger by showing that Palestinians were willing to live peacefully alongside Israelis.

Explanation:

The Israeli-Palestinian clash is one of the world's longest-running and most controversial conflicts. At its heart, it is a contention between two self-determination movements— the Jewish Zionist task and the Palestinian national project— that make a case for a similar region. In any case, it is thus, a great deal more confounded than that, with apparently every reality and chronicled detail little and extensive contested by the opposite sides and their defenders.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Parliament asked william and mary from the netherlands to take over england when james ii tried to:
Pavlova-9 [17]

The British Parliament asked William and Mary to take over England because James II wanted to dismiss Parliament.

<h3>Why did Parliament enthrone Mary?</h3>

King James II believed in the Divine Right of Kings and did not like answering to Parliament.

He therefore tried to dissolve Parliament and put up one that would be loyal to him. The Parliamentarian refused and revolted in the Glorious Revolution, where Mary and her Dutch husband, William, were invited to the throne.

Find out more on the Glorious Revolution at brainly.com/question/1419592.

#SPJ1

5 0
2 years ago
Homer is never imitated in the novel Joseph Andrews.<br>True <br>False​
LenKa [72]

Answer:

false

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • 10 acontecimientos de la revolución mexicana
    11·2 answers
  • How was Christianity spread throughout the Roman Empire soon after the death of Jesus?
    5·1 answer
  • Why was the discovery of the New World of interest to the Catholic Church?
    8·1 answer
  • In what way did President Grant's approach to Reconstruction differ from that of President Johnson?
    10·2 answers
  • What is the main reason the United States backed South Vietnam?
    6·2 answers
  • Which is a true statement about the U.S. Constitution
    10·2 answers
  • The main difference between London smog and L.A. smog is that
    12·1 answer
  • Why did the United States support open trade? Check
    8·2 answers
  • Has the electoral college changed since it’s inception? If so, describe the changes and the purpose for the change.
    6·1 answer
  • This is for my sister help her Texas and Alaska have large reserves of which natural resource?
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!