1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Maru [420]
4 years ago
10

Read the following historical perspectives from two modern-day historians. Which of the following explains why Historian A menti

ons the issue of slavery while Historian B does not?
Historian A:
The American Revolution was caused by the American colonists’ greedy desire for more money. They were simply tired of paying their fair share of taxes to the British government, even though British troops protected the colonies during the French and Indian War! Furthermore, their claims to be fighting for freedom and liberty are totally wrong. Many of the colonists still owned slaves at the time of the Revolution! The traitorous American colonists simply wanted to steal land that was already claimed by Great Britain.
Historian B:
The American Revolution was completely justified due to Great Britain’s repeated abuse of the colonists. The British passed enormous taxes on goods in the colonies, even though the Americans had no say in the British government. British soldiers were also allowed to live in American houses and eat common people’s food without paying. During the Boston Massacre, British soldiers even fired their muskets into a crowd of civilians! Under such oppressive conditions, it’s no wonder that the patriotic colonists would want to fight for the freedom and liberty of all people!
A. Historian B wants to make the British appear to be disinterested in American affairs, including the terrible institution of slavery.
B. Historian A wants to make the colonists appear in a negative light by suggesting that they did not really believe in freedom for all.
C. Historian A is using slavery as a metaphor to argue that the American colonists have treated their British leaders poorly.
D. Historian B is making a purely economic argument, so there is no need for him to mention the institution of slavery.
History
1 answer:
Ket [755]4 years ago
8 0
The answer is b historian a clearly has a thing against colonists

You might be interested in
The career of the privateer Sir Francis Drake shows that ?​
Art [367]

Answer:

As well as circumnavigating the globe, Sir Francis Drake is regarded as a slave dealer for making many journeys to the West Indies. Later, he represented Queen Elizabeth I as just a buccaneer as well as navy officer tasked with attacking the property of Spain. He was once the leader of Plymouth, England.

His career shows that experience is the best knowledge. His whole life is evidence of the fact that one can be anything they want no matter what their situation was when they were born.        

7 0
3 years ago
Can someone answer the highlighted question based on the text!!!! Please, someone, help me!!!!!!
zubka84 [21]
When a government ends by invasion it mostly dissolved by the invaders or rioters in a usaul violent way of overthrowing leaders. The other more peaceful way is when a leader shows the problems of the current government in hopes of changing the laws or ending courrption. Hopes This Help! Justin
8 0
3 years ago
While the Han dynasty established the Silk Road, the Tang dynasty developed the route to its fullest potential. Examine the map
Anastasy [175]

Answer:

A-the silk road increased contact between China and the Middle East

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Based on information from both selections, why do you think the employers were able to continue mistreating child employees even
diamong [38]

Hello. You did not show the text to which this question refers, which makes it difficult to create an accurate answer.

However, we can say that employers continued to mistreat working children even after the 1833 Factory Act because the government failed to propose strong supervision of factories to ensure that the law was being enforced. In addition, due to economic needs, employees, including children, submitted to the wishes of employers, since factories were important sources of income and were responsible for almost all necessary products during the industrial revolution.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What did the Indian Removal Act of 1830 authorize
Snowcat [4.5K]
The Indian removal act was to allow President Andrew Jackson to negotiate with southern tribes for their removal to western lands. There was nothing in the west to help them prosper so a lot of the Native Americans died along the way (trail of tears). Im an enrolled member of the Crow Tribe so I'm pretty educated in these departments. Hope this helps!
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 96 POINTS!!!!!!!!
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following would contribute most to the creation of a strong economy? (3 points) A. The government limiting loans to
    9·2 answers
  • What is the first president
    6·2 answers
  • Adrian wants to delve into database administration. Which certifications would help him along this career path?
    15·1 answer
  • How are the powers of the federal government limited? Check all that apply.
    12·2 answers
  • Which of the following did Mexico and the Republic of Texas continue to fig
    13·1 answer
  • How did the Tokugawa Shagunate view foreign people and their presence in Japan?​
    7·1 answer
  • Which production method emerged during the Second Industrial Revolution? waterwheel assembly line spinning jenny mills
    9·1 answer
  • Using what you’ve just learned, select the reasons why American sentiment turned against the war in Vietnam over the course of t
    5·1 answer
  • What happened to slaves after the Civil War?.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!