In positive punishment contingent removal of an aversive stimulus reduces the likelihood that the response will occur again in the future.
In negative punishment the contingent presentation of a stimulus reduces the likelihood the response will occur again in the future.
<h3>What do positive reinforcement and negative reinforcement have in common with each other?</h3>
- Punishment can be used in a positive or bad way, much like reinforcement.
- Any reinforcer, whether positive or negative, makes a behavioral response more likely.
- Positive or negative punishments both reduce the chance of a behavioral response.
<h3>What is reinforcement and its types?</h3>
- Everything that strengthens or improves a behavior qualifies as reinforcement.
- For instance, in a classroom context, forms of reinforcement may include praise, allowing pupils skip over unneeded assignments, or offering out small rewards like candy, extra downtime, or enjoyable hobbies.
<h3>What is positive and negative reinforcement and punishment?</h3>
- By including something desired, positive reinforcement improves the intended behavior (good).
- Aversive reinforcement reduces the goal behavior in positive punishment (bad).
- By removing an unpleasant stimulus, negative reinforcement makes the intended behavior more frequent.
Learn more about positive and negative reinforcement here:
brainly.com/question/2994390
#SPJ4
In 1898, the bowl weevil infected the cotton crops of the South leaving acres and acres of cotton devastated. Finally, the hold of King Cotton in the South was finished. In 1914, foreign immigration stopped with WW I which left industries in the North short of workers. Some people migrated to the North to get factory jobs. Big businesses decided to help with the war effort and because they needed a good supply of workers, decided to built factories in the south. At this point the South was behind in education, labor skills, etc. because the idea of the South was the better of the two regions still lay in the minds of many Southerners. However, some had left farms years ago and were just waiting for a chance to see what the North had to offer. When the coal mines opened up, many ex-farmers headed North to see what kind of jobs could be found. As more people quit working the land and headed North, some would stop off at different places and some would continue onward. If the big crop of cotton had not failed, many would have been stuck in the Southern way of life and racism from the end of the Civil War.
