Answer:
I only know the positives but that's a start I hope :/
They benefit from the geography of this region in which they had the deserts for protection of attacks, the Nile River for trade, transportation, and the fresh water for the crops and people.
The United States and its allies worried that if Vietnam fell to the communists, other countries in Southeast Asia would follow. This was known as "domino theory" -- that the spread of communism in Vietnam would result in other countries in the region falling like dominoes to the influence of communism.
President Dwight Eisenhower is the one who initiated the use of the term "domino theory." In a speech he gave in April, 1954, Eisenhower warned that if French Indochina fell to communism, it very likely could cause a domino effect in Southeast Asia. French Indochina is what the region of Vietnam was called during the days of French colonialism there. The movement against French colonial control was led by Vietnamese nationalist who also happened to be communists. The Vietamese nationalist / communist movement was led by HoChi Minh.
The Third state of the realm, during the Ancient Regime and the feudal system, was one of the three social classes in which society was divided: clergy (1st state), nobels (2nd state) and peasants and burgeosie (3rd state). There is almost no social mobility between them, and the three are ruled by a monarch with absolut powers. The power of the King was believed to be granted directly by God.
Peasants worked for feudal lords in rural areas, while bourgeois were mainly artisans who worked in the cities, and most have made money and had become traders or entrepeneurs there. The French Revolution was triggered due to the desires of this bourgeois, as representatives of the Thirds State, who wanted to get rid of the feudal structures that situated their social class always subject to the desires of the 1st and 2nd state and of course, of the King. Instead, they defended that the power of a nation arises from its citizens, who should grant it to representatives or rulers through sufragge, in opposition to absolute kings and the clergy and nobels as their servants. They also claimed for their personal freedoms and rights, such as, the private property.
