Answer:
1. In<u>ductive argument</u>.
2. <u>Inductive argument.</u>
3. <u>Deductve argument.</u>
Explanation:
1. This argument is inductive. The conclusion is a generalization, that is drawn by a premise, the premise has been obtained out of experimentation.
If two grains of sand have diamons, it doesn´t mean the entire beach is made of them. This argument is not strong because the conclusion is not accurate.
2. This is a deductive argument. This type of argument depends on the logic struture of it. If the premise were to be true, the conclusion would be true also.
It is not a sound argument, because thanksgiving happends every fourth thursday of november. It is an invalid argument because the premise is false, there for the concusion is false.
3. This is an invalid deductive argument. The premise is incorrect, so the conclusion that is being deduce from it is also wrong. It is not a sound argument because if you double the length of the sides of a square, the area would quatriple.
Answer:
Brocka´s or expressive
Carlos had a stroke and although he has recovered many of his motor skills, he still has considerable difficulty with language. It is almost impossible for Carlos to produce speech, although he comprehends both written and spoken language quite well. Carlos is demonstrating characteristics of Brocka´s or expressive aphasia.
Explanation:
When you have a stroke and in the aftermath you have difficulties to say complete words, articulate sentences or you incoherently emit sounds that don´t resemble a sentence, you´re experiencing expressive aphasia.
Answer: The Congress had no authority to levy taxes, and was required to request money, supplies, and troops from the states to support the war effort. Individual states frequently ignored these requests.
<span>In her holocaust memorial, Rachel Whiteread depicted the shapes of identical books as a (reference to the Jews as "the people of the book".)</span>
The statement above describes normative ethics as it is the
one responsible for explaining moral behavior of which an individual exhibits.
It is a way of explaining with the use of rules or ethics, and even theories,
in pointing out an individual’s way of doing or handling things that could
affect their choices in a way whether it is right or wrong.
