1)Original Equation: V=lwh
Divide by lw: V/w=lw/lw(h)
Answer: h= V/lw
2)Set up the equation as V=lwh
Substitute the variables for numbers: 50=10(2)h
Multiply 10*2: 50=20h
Divide 50each side by 20 to get rid of 20h: 50/20=20/20
H=2.5
The height of the box is 2.5 meters tall.
Answer: Choice B
There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains 0.
========================================================
Explanation:
The confidence interval is (-0.29, 0.09)
This is the same as writing -0.29 < p1-p1 < 0.09
The thing we're trying to estimate (p1-p2) is between -0.29 and 0.09
Because 0 is in this interval, it is possible that p1-p1 = 0 which leads to p1 = p2.
Therefore, it is possible that the population proportions are the same.
The question asks " is there convincing evidence of a difference in the true proportions", so the answer to this is "no, there isn't convincing evidence". We would need both endpoints of the confidence interval to either be positive together, or be negative together, for us to have convincing evidence that the population proportions are different.
Answer: 18+54
Step-by-step explanation:
6*3=18 and 6*9=54
It’s called integers which is the spectrum of positive and negative number the answer to that would be negative five written -5
9514 1404 393
Answer:
a = -2, h = 2, k = 1
Step-by-step explanation:
Compare the expressions. Match one pattern to the other.

__
The transformations are ...
Translation by (h, k) = (2, 1). That is, 2 units right and 1 unit up.
Vertical scaling by "a", which is (i) reflection over the x-axis (because a < 0), and (ii) expansion by a factor of 2.
A table and graph are shown in the attachment.