1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Molodets [167]
2 years ago
11

Why did the companies control the government of their colonies? They did not believe in the rights of the people. They wanted to

control the colonists so they could provide profits for the company. They had planned to gradually allow government by the people. They were acting under the king's order to control their colony.
History
1 answer:
Luden [163]2 years ago
8 0

I. Natural Rights of the Colonists as Men.

Among the natural rights of the Colonists are these: First, a right to life; Secondly, to liberty; Thirdly, to property; together with the right to support and defend them in the best manner they can. These are evident branches of, rather than deductions from, the duty of self-preservation, commonly called the first law of nature.

All men have a right to remain in a state of nature as long as they please; and in case of intolerable oppression, civil or religious, to leave the society they belong to, and enter into another.

When men enter into society, it is by voluntary consent; and they have a right to demand and insist upon the performance of such conditions and previous limitations as form an equitable original compact.

Every natural right not expressly given up, or, from the nature of a social compact, necessarily ceded, remains.

All positive and civil laws should conform, as far as possible, to the law of natural reason and equity.

As neither reason requires nor religion permits the contrary, every man living in or out of a state of civil society has a right peaceably and quietly to worship God according to the dictates of his conscience.

“Just and true liberty, equal and impartial liberty,” in matters spiritual and temporal, is a thing that all men are clearly entitled to by the eternal and immutable laws of God and nature, as well as by the law of nations and all well-grounded municipal laws, which must have their foundation in the former.

In regard to religion, mutual toleration in the different professions thereof is what all good and candid minds in all ages have ever practised, and, both by precept and example, inculcated on mankind. And it is now generally agreed among Christians that this spirit of toleration, in the fullest extent consistent with the being of civil society, is the chief characteristical mark of the Church. Insomuch that Mr. Locke has asserted and proved, beyond the possibility of contradiction on any solid ground, that such toleration ought to be extended to all whose doctrines are not subversive of society. The only sects which he thinks ought to be, and which

by all wise laws are excluded from such toleration, are those who teach doctrines subversive of the civil government under which they live. The Roman Catholics or Papists are excluded by reason of such doctrines as these, that princes excommunicated may be deposed, and those that they call heretics may be destroyed without mercy; besides their recognizing the Pope in so absolute a manner, in subversion of government, by introducing, as far as possible into the states under whose protection they enjoy life, liberty, and property, that solecism in politics, imperium in imperio, leading directly to the worst anarchy and confusion, civil discord, war, and bloodshed.

You might be interested in
Why did the Mexican revolution last so many years?
Sveta_85 [38]
It was a long and bloody struggle among several factions in constantly shifting alliances which resulted ultimately in the end of the 30-year dictatorship in Mexico and the establishment of a constitutional republic.
5 0
3 years ago
Help pleasee !!!!!!!!!!!!
Brilliant_brown [7]

Answer:

The Articles established a weak central government and placed most powers in the hands of the states. Under the Articles, the US economy faltered, since the central government lacked the power to enforce tax laws or regulate commerce.

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Woodrow Wilson's distrust of corporate banking led him to:
Elden [556K]

Answer:

Creation of Federal Reserve System

Explanation:

An important innovation initiated by Wilson was a complete reorganization of the financial and banking system and monetary circulation. Today, it is difficult for Americans to imagine what kind of financial turmoil reigned in their country from the time of the Civil War until the beginning of the 20th century. At that time, about seven thousand banks were functioning. Gold and silver coins, certificates, notes of the National Bank were in circulation, and all the monetary circulation was under the full control of Wall Street.

To harmonize the financial system with the needs of the economy, Wilson was pushing for a law to create the Federal Reserve System (Fed), which serves as the central bank of the United States. The President adhered to the “golden mean.” He listened to the advice of conservatives and, for the sake of the effective functioning of the financial system, agreed to create 12 regional federal banks. However, the stumbling block was the principle of forming the Fed's board, which, according to the personal plan of Wilson and his progressive advisers, was supposed to regulate its activities. The president had to withstand the extraordinary pressure of banking tycoons accusing him of trying to strip them of control of their property. But he did not make any concessions, considering the appointment of the composition of the board of the Federal Reserve System solely the competence of the president. Therefore, in the management of the Fed, although its ownership is private, the state plays a significant role.

5 0
3 years ago
Explain the impact of the popular forms of entertainment in the late 1800s.
Dima020 [189]
They were inexpensive and readily available to large numbers of people
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Does Washington agree or disagree with the existence of political parties?
Mazyrski [523]

Answer:

He agrees

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In the 1850 why did harriet tumban feel caompelled yo record wher ewcaped slaves all the way to st.C qa termines why , for examp
    14·1 answer
  • Which is not a way a citizen can participate in policy-making decisions
    14·2 answers
  • An organization that allows people to work together to change government by gaining political power is
    9·2 answers
  • The graph which can show trends over time is the?
    10·2 answers
  • What is the Sahel???????
    8·2 answers
  • Why did the Dutch have difficulty finding settlers for new Netherlands?
    8·2 answers
  • What does the worfMzgfzkg ztkslgstksyduhdlhyfufufj cfufufjrr. huh
    15·1 answer
  • The period in Texas history we are currently discussing is ____________. a. between the 1620s and 1630s b. between the 1720s and
    5·2 answers
  • Name the three major effects of the Industrial Revolution
    8·2 answers
  • According to the 50-30-20 rule, you should plan on spending 50 percent of
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!