1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lianna [129]
3 years ago
6

The ""normal"" high temperature for a given day is determined from the ____ averaged high temperature for that day. a. 30-year b

. monthly c. weekly d. 20-year
Geography
1 answer:
Sunny_sXe [5.5K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer: 30 year

Explanation:

The normal high temperature for a given day determined by the temperature of a place averaged over a period of time, often 30 years. This is also described as climate information. Climate information includes the statistical weather information that tells us about the normal weather, and also the range of weather extremes for a location. Most weather forecasters rely of past weather to predict the normal high temperature of a given day.

The average high or low temperature is the normalized high or low temperature for at least a 30 year period. Therefore, an average high is a statistical average. Records need to be kept at least 30 years for an average high temperature, for the information to be statistically meaningful.

You might be interested in
Marine magnetic anomalies result from seafloor spreading in conjunction with
TiliK225 [7]

Answer:

D. magnetic polarity reversals

Explanation:

The marine magnetic anomalies are the result of two things; the seafloor spreading at the mid-ocean ridges and the magnetic polarity reversals.

The mid-ocean ridges are the places where the new crust forms. This places also have big influence on the magnetic anomalies, with the reason being that the magnetism has higher influence in this parts.

Also, the magnetic polarity reversals play a big role. The Earth has not always had the same magnetic polarity, and multiple times throughout its past the North and South Poles have been switching places when it comes to the magnetism.

The igneous rocks on the ocean floor have proof in them about this, as the metallic components are reacting to the magnetism and face toward the stronger magnetic field.

8 0
2 years ago
X Classkick XkeygOnRqyARMdnafERHw/questions/AXKL8VCZSveig dyQwkHcg Epic! - Books for Kids RL ar e! Epic! - Books for Kids Nearpo
sesenic [268]
Factors of 110 by Prime Factorization
the prime factors of 110 are 2, 5, and 11 because it’s not a prime number
3 0
3 years ago
If platinum has a density of 21.46g/cm³ ... if you have 5cm³ volume of platinum what is its mass​
mixer [17]

Answer:

107.3g

Explanation:Density = Mass/Volume

There are two methods either by taking the above formula and inserting the values or by using Mass = Denstiy*Volume

Here I have showed you both the ways:

1st

As Desnity  is 21.46g/cm^3

Volume = 5cm^3

Let m be mass

21.46g/cm^3=m/5cm^3

Cross multiplication takes place here

21.46*5=m

107.3 =m

Therefore, mass of platinum = 107.3g

2nd

Mass = Denstiy*Volume

Density = 21.46g/cm^3

Volume = 5cm^3

m=21.46g/cm^3* 5g/cm^3

m= 107.3g

5 0
3 years ago
20
Murljashka [212]
B is correct because the others are wrong, c is wrong because the reason they have varying states of matter is because pressure and a is wrong because mantle
7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the main reason Wegener’s continental drift hypothesis was rejected? He could provide only illogical explanations for t
PilotLPTM [1.2K]

Wegener could not provide a wholly acceptable explanation for the movement of the continents.

Explanation:

Alfred Wegener is the person that developed and promoted the continental drift theory. Despite him having developed the basic idea behind the process, as well as managing to find several clues to support it, his ideas were not accepted by the other scientists and he found it extremely hard to gain support. The main reason as to why this was the case was that he didn't really had wholly acceptable explanation about the movement of the continents.

Everything that Wegener provided as evidence was correct, and it was proving a point. The problem was that he still lacked explanation for the driving force of this process, nor did he had any proof about it, and that was the basis for all other things. Every clue that he had was the final product, but no one could explain as to how that actually happened.

Some of Wegener's evidence were:

  • identical fossils on different continents
  • matching coastlines
  • spreading zones
  • matching rock strata on different continents

Learn more about the continental drift theory brainly.com/question/5002949

#learnwithBrainly

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Pros and Cons of the Marcellus Shale, Issue Analysis On the Marcellus Shale, and Works Cited on the Marcellus Shale. PLEASE HELP
    14·1 answer
  • What is it called when the amount of the moons lighted surface seen on earth increases
    6·1 answer
  • What is 18 percent of $450
    7·2 answers
  • Need help on number 2
    5·2 answers
  • Which type of stress results when two plates slide past one another? A. compression B. tension C. force D. shear
    7·2 answers
  • On a topographic map, the farther apart the contour lines, the steeper the slope of the mountain or hill represented
    14·1 answer
  • Oduction to U...
    10·1 answer
  • Processed meteorites with high metal content probably are: a) chunks of the core of a larger asteroid that was shattered by a co
    6·1 answer
  • Looking down at the north pole, earth rotates in a _____________ direction, once every ___________.
    11·1 answer
  • What kind of fault does the Nazca plate share with the Pacific plate?
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!