Governments can exist for many reasons. In your opinion, which answers describe the most important roles of

Why is the right to a jury trial guaranteed by the Bill of Rights? Why might someone choose not to have a jury trial?

balu736 [363]

The right to a jury trial guaranteed by the Bill of Rights to prevent oppression by the government.

<h3><u>Explanation:</u></h3>

This reflects a clear judgement on which way a law should be carried on, a law is enforced and how the justice is given. The criminal defendants can seek the right to jury to "prevent oppression by the government" and raise their voice against any misdoings.

A defendant may arrive before the court and seek justice if he or she thinks that he has been going through injustice. It is most important fundamental rights in America. All the defendants are allowed to the right to jury trial.

8 0

3 years ago

"prison is too expensive and doesn't work , present a case for and against this statement "

user100 [1]

This is a great question with various for and against points so i shall just give you a few that come to mind.

FOR

-conditions can be below to basic living standards, which is immoral and a violation of human rights

-People wouldn't voluntarily pay money to maintain the living conditions of convicts due to the atrocities of their crime.

-Statistics support the fact 'it doesn't work' as rehabilitation is in the minority

-it does not reduce crime rate in the slightest

-corruption

AGAINST

-what is the question suggesting should happen to convicts instead?

-wrongfully convicted

apologies im running out of time, so i can write appropriate against. hope this helps though

4 0

3 years ago

Molly Weasley bought a Great Lakes spa from Mundungus, a dealer who was selling spas at the state fair.

BartSMP [9]

1) The theory of product liability under which Weasley could have sued Mundungus to recover for Ginny's injuries is strict product liability.

However, the facts do not support such a claim because the negligence of Weasley caused Ginny's injuries. How could a child of six years be left alone in a spa?

<h3>What are the theories of product liability?</h3>

The theories of product liability, which involve injury or damage caused by a defective product, include negligence, breach of contract/warranty, and strict liability.

For strict liability to be imposed on Great Lakes, Weasley must prove that the tort occurred based on Mundungus' irresponsibility. The question is, was Mundungus responsible for caring for Ginny or her mother?

2) The Privity of contract would not be required in a product liability case against Great Lakes. Since the spa is a product of Great Lakes while Mundungus sold it to Weasley, there is no basis for Great Lakes to deny privity of contract.

<h3>What is the privity of contract?</h3>

Using privity of contract as a basis of defense means that only parties to a contract have right to sue and be sued so that they can enforce the rights and obligations arising from the contract.

3) The six requirements that Weasley must meet for action in strict product liability against Great Lakes are proving that:

The spa caused Ginny to be injured and not Weasley's negligence.
The spa that injured Ginny was defective.
The defect of the spa caused Ginny's injury.
The defect of the spa made it dangerous for Ginny.
The negligence arose from Great Lakes.
Great Lakes breached the contract warranty.

4) The defenses to product liability that Mundungus or Great Lakes can assert are as follows:

Weasley lacks the locus standi.
No duty of care was owed to Ginny by Mundungus or Great Lakes.
Weasley misused the spa through her negligence.
Weasley must know the riskiness of abandoning Ginny in the spa.

Thus, none of the theories of product liability supports Weasley's case.

Learn more about the theories of product liability at brainly.com/question/17202560

4 0

2 years ago

Ipahayag Ang pag sang ayon o pag salungat sa pagpapatupad ng anti terrorism law

Nadusha1986 [10]

Answer:

sang ayon ako

Explanation:

dahil ito ay ikabubuti ng tao

4 0

3 years ago

To define an act as deviant is to make a subjective judgment, but it can be objectively determined that all deviant acts have a

IceJOKER [234]

Answer:

It is TRUE that to define an act as deviant is to make a subjective judgment, but it can be objectively determined that all deviant acts have a negative impact on the moral standards of a society.

Explanation:

Deviant behaviors, or deviant acts in society refer to behavior that violate social norms and expectations. Deviance can be something as small as dressing in gothic clothing, or something as serious as burning someone's house down.

Morals are the prevailing standards of behavior that enable people to live cooperatively in groups. Moral refers to what societies sanction as right and acceptable. Most people tend to act morally and follow societal guidelines. Morality describes the particular values of a specific group at a specific point in time.

4 0

2 years ago