Answer:
More leaning towards trails like adults depending on the crime committed.
Explanation:
Answer: There is no general exception to the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement in national security cases.
Explanation:
Other well-established exceptions to the warrant requirement include consensual searches, certain brief investigatory stops, searches incident to a valid arrest, and seizures of items in plain view.
Answer:
The statement that is true about criminal law is It involves wrongs against society.
Explanation:
Lets use process of elimination!
The first sentence states It provides the injured party with a remedy.
This would be personal injury case, not a criminal case.
The second sentence states It involves wrongs against individuals.
This would be a civil matter, not a criminal case.
The third sentence states It tries to return the injured party to the same position before injury.
This again would be a civil matter, not a criminal case.
Which leaves the fourth and final sentence. It states It involves wrongs against society.
This is the correct answer because if you did something to an individual, it would be a civil matter, but the wrongs against society would be like commiting a homicide, robery, grand theft, assult, arson, kidnapping, etc.
Hopefully this helps!!
Let me know if you still need help or if you have any questions!
Answer:
D. Line of sight restrictions
Explanation:
There are usually no lights and the roads only have two lanes and they are usually very narrow and it is hard to tell when traffic is coming from the other direction which means there is an increased risk of head on collisons. Its is also unsafe to pass on rural areas.
(I hope this answers you question! Happy early Thanksgiving!)
:)
