They represent the older layers of earth under the water.
Copying my answer from this question from another student who asked the same one:
Social Darwinism is the belief that people and business are subject to the same laws of nature and natural selection. This has been used by business leaders, both in the Gilded Age and today, to create a belief that the strongest businesses are the ones that survive because they survive the competitive process of natural selection.
So, massive oil companies and railroad companies (and tech companies and banks today) used social darwinism to explain their rise to almost monopoly status as a "natural" thing that was accomplished merely using the laws of nature.
Answer:
Short-term memory
Explanation:
Suppose you are out of town and have to access one of your password protected accounts. You look up the number on your password list, but by the time you are ready to access the account, you have forgotten that password. This best illustrates the limited capacity of Short-term memory. Short-term memory is the information that a person is currently thinking about or is aware of and caused you to look up the number on your password list, but by the time you are ready to access the account, you have forgotten that password.
There is no right or wrong, which distinguishes Christian ethics from strictly scientific ethics for a number of reasons.
<h3>What distinctions exist between Christian and scientific ethics?</h3>
The sciences have been and continue to be supported by Christianity. Many clergy have been involved in the sciences, and it has been widely used in the construction of schools, universities, and hospitals. Christian ethics is not a theory, model, framework, or intellectual creation of either humans or the divine. Christian ethics are fundamentally distinct from those of all other world religions. Each ethical philosophy offers concepts (propositions) regarding what is right and wrong. These concepts are either human conceptions or they are said to be divine. Scientific and religious explanations can in reality conflict when religious explanations explicitly make use of or presuppose empirical truths and when these claims are known to be true. Religion deals with the spiritual and supernatural, whereas science studies the natural world; as a result, the two can complement one another. There need not be a tension between religious belief and the scientific view of evolution, according to statements made by several religious organizations.
To know more about Christian ethics and scientific ethics, click here:
brainly.com/question/21842202
#SPJ4