<span>The probability that this person was a victim of identity theft that occurred from the unauthorized use of a credit card is 0.05%. </span>
A. the existence of at least one fixed input is the primary difference between short run and long run. It is because in the long run, the quantities of all inputs can be varied.
In economics, the short run can be defined as a concept that states that, within a certain period in the future. In the short run the others are variable while at least one input is fixed. In the other side, long run in economics can be defined as a theoretical concept in which all prices and quantities have fully adjusted and all markets are in equilibrium.
Learn more about long run here brainly.com/question/17029465
#SPJ4
Answer:
The correct answers are letters "A", "D", and "E": Use a business letter format; Send a separate letter to each interviewer; Mention something you liked about the interview.
Explanation:
A <em>job interview </em>does not end after leaving the prospective company where you could work. Most organizations decide to choose one applicant over another if they contact their interviewers after the interview. For that purpose, that last contact must be a <em>formal letter stating what your impressions are of the company and why you are still interested in obtaining the job position</em>. Besides, if there was more than one interviewer, <em>a unique letter should be addressed to each of interviewer</em>.
Answer:
7.92%
Explanation:
The computation of the return on total assets is shown below:
Return on assets = (Net income) ÷ (average of total assets)
where,
Net income is $2,100
Average total assets = (Beginning total assets + ending total assets) ÷ 2
= ($33,500 + $19,500) ÷ 2
= $26,500
Now put these values to the above formula
So, the ratio would equal to
= $2,100 ÷ $26,500
= 7.92%
Answer:
a motion for summary judgement.
Explanation:
According to my research on different legal proceedings , I can say that based on the information provided within the question this is a motion for summary judgement. This term refers to a request for the court to rule that the other party has no case, because there are no facts at issue. Which applies to this situation because Turista Airlines is not presenting any facts, yet they are arguing the case based on those non-existent facts.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
