Answer:
One of the roles of Federal courts is to review cases that have been appealed in the state courts, Option A.
Explanation:
Federal courts hear many cases like the cases which involve constitutionality of a law. There may be cases which involves treaties of public ministers or Ambassadors, disputes between two or more states can also be resolved by federal courts.
In 1950s, though the Constitution had stated that everyone is equal but still African Americans were not always treated equally. Federal courts could take cases that have been appealed in state courts, in case the concerned person is not happy with the result.
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
There was a warning before the snuck into the park, the company did not expect that children would want to snuck into the park that is why they created those barriers that injuries her. Am sure the company already has a permit to actually place the sign in the park to notify the public of the there rules, so it is to the detriment of the girl because there was a warning sir and based on the evidence the company presented, the court with grant them what they wish.
According to the central principle of utility, actions are right in proportion, as they tend to promote happiness, and wrong, as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness (pain).
<h3>
What is the principle of utility?</h3>
The concept of the principle of utility refers to the standard that determines whether or not any action is acceptable. According to the propensity it shows to either increase or decrease the happiness of the party whose interest is under consideration, or, to put it another way, to support or oppose that happiness.
For instance, the utilitarian viewpoint holds that you should select the flavour of ice cream that will make you feel the happiest if you are making a decision for yourself. If you like chocolate but detest vanilla, go with chocolate for the delight it will provide, and stay away from vanilla because it will make you unhappy.
Learn more about the principle of utility here:
brainly.com/question/14530098
#SPJ4
Answer:
That statement is false.
Explanation:
Many of the members of De Soto's expedition were carriers of diseases such as measles, smallpox, and chicken pox. Very few of American Indian have resistance to the disease because they never exist near their environment before.
As a result, the Infections ran rampant in the American Indian's community.
Since they did not have a medical knowledge to deal with it, the contagion resulted in a lot of deaths. Massively decreased American Indian's population.
Work, for example is the subject of an entire branch of psychology. psychological, behavioural, emotional, and social factors.
