Answer:
The Supreme Court case known as Kelo v. City of New London was controversial because it allowed greater use of the power of eminent domain.
Explanation:
Kelo v. City of New London is a judgment of the US Supreme Court on whether the government can expropriating private property and transferring it to another private entity, with the purpose of economic development of the city. The plaintiff, Kelo, was the resident of the requisitioned land, and the defendant was the municipality of New London, Connecticut. On June 23, 2005, the latest judgment of the US Supreme Court on this case attracted wide attention. This case involved a “paid collection” of land. According to the latest judgment of the US Supreme Court, local municipalities have the power to impose private land for commercial development – as long as such development falls within the category of “public use”. The Supreme Court ruled that “the city’s planned deployment of land acquisition is in line with 'public use' and within the meaning of the Fifth Amendment clause.” Therefore, the case also triggered a new round of discussions on how to implement the Fifth Amendment, how to explain it, and how to use it.
Family teaches the child about life and getting along, family teaches the child everyday things.
"You are safe to have sex; you can resume sexual relations when you desire" responses by the nurse is most appropriate.
Option C
<u>Explanation</u>:
A person's sexual intercourse is based on his desire. If the sexual intercourse is absent or limited, it is because he is in depression, the desire for the sexual intercourse has decreases/diminished, and he has fears or anxiety, having an issue with his partner or fatigue. There is no scientific or physiologic basis to refrain the sexual intercourse. If you have problem with "retrograde ejaculation", then it is not because of the myocardial infarction because diabetes can cause the retrograde ejaculation but MI is not reason for it.
Answer:
In the Preamble to the Constitution, the framers outlined their general goals: to create a just government and to ensure peace, an adequate national defense, and a healthy, free nation.
Explanation:
Goals of the ConstitutionWe the People of the United States, in Order (1)to form a more perfect Union, (2)establish Justice, (3)ensure domestic Tranquility, (4)provide for the common defense, (5)promote the general Welfare, and (6)secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish . ...
hope this helps I copy-pasted the explanation part but it is correct I've done this before. Have an awesome day.
Federalism in a workplace is characterized by equal and responsible distribution of power between a general and a specific base of power.
Explanation:
In an office space, the manager or the executive officer can represent the general authority which is the representation of the union government in the federation. The specific officers working within that manager's scope serve the position of the regional powers or the states.
In this system, it would mean that there is a division of power and that the manager is treated on equal footing in terms of stature with the workers even though their job is to oversee the work.
There would be certain areas where the workers can work unquestioned and some areas where they have to consult the manager.
