Answer: (B)
The court ruled that political action committees (PACs) could accept unlimited contributions for making "Independent Expenditures"
Explanation:
Political Action Committees (PACs) are independent groups created to raise money in support of a particular candidate.
Prior to the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission case, the amount of money that could be contributed to PACs was limited.
In 2010, the supreme court ruled in favor of Citizens United, in the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission case.
The ruling was that corporations and unions were allowed to spend as much as they wanted to, in support of their chosen candidates as long as the corporations were independent of the campaigns. Therefore PACs could receive unlimited contributions.
According to the Supreme court, political spending is protected under the 1st amendment, as it is a form of free speech.
This was an important case as it helped ease the restrictions on political spending.
By protecting intellectual property, we made a specific invention could only be produced by the inventors alone.
Which means that the companies in other countries do not possess the right to produce it. This will increase the GDP of the country where the inventors came from
hope this helps
The answer is A(Support for Israel feel in the United States.)
Short answer C
A is wrong. The oil producing countries in the middle east do not have a manufacturing base.
B is also wrong. Saudi Arabia is the largest exporter of oil. There is no need for them to import any oil at all. They produce a very clean low content sulfur type of oil.
C is the answer <<<<< answer
