1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zaharov [31]
2 years ago
14

Why did conservatives oppose the new deal? a. They thought Roosevelt was not doing enough to provide relief. b. They believed it

gave the government too much power in the economy. c. They did not think that the financial system had any problems. d. They thought that Roosevelt was not qualified to be president.
History
2 answers:
ollegr [7]2 years ago
8 0

B.They believed it gave the government too much power in the economy

Further Explanation-

The United States had been hard hit with the Great Depression, which brought its economy to a standstill. President Roosevelt formulated a program called the ‘New Deal’ which gave the Federal Government powers to revitalize and re-boost the economy. Although the new deal was planned to reduce employment and invest billions of dollars into economy, its policies did not have any long-term significant results, although it provided for immediate relief. His New Deal program was highly unpopular with the rich elites, who were taxed more to pay for the expensive social welfare programs. The New Deal also met with significant criticism from the Republicans who insisted that the Federal Government was encroaching on the powers of the regional governments in their responsibilities to boost state commerce and economy.  

Senator Huey Long, from Louisiana, was the most famous opponent of the New Deal, as he opened that the measures and programs of the New Deal were not effective enough to bring the economy back to pre-war levels. He criticized Roosevelt’s policies claiming that he did not bring relief measures for the poor. His political statements were highly unpopular, and his alternatives were unacceptable by both the rich and poor. Roosevelt’s New Deal program was criticized by the Supreme Court from a legal viewpoint, as it declared the Federal Government’s interference in state economic policies as unconstitutional. It also declared the National Recovery Administration as illegal. The Catholics wanted the implementation of a ‘fair minimum wage’ to the economically downtrodden, which was not included within the New Deal.

Lean more:

  1. What was the charge of the 1807 indictment by the man who was chosen as vice president on February 17, 1801, by the house of representatives after thirty-six ballots? <u>brainly.com/question/1236015 </u>
  2. What is the last step in the lawmaking process? <u>brainly.com/question/1332681 </u>
  3. As the result of a conflict between British troops and a colonial militia in Massachusetts,<u> brainly.com/question/8775340 </u>

Answer Details-

Grade- High School

Chapter- The Great Depression

Subject- History

Keywords-

New Deal, economic recovery, taxation of rich, social welfare, state economy, unconstitutional, National Recovery administration, fair minimum wage.

yuradex [85]2 years ago
4 0

The correct answer is B) They believed it gave the government too much power in the economy.

Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal Program was meant to help America recover from the Great Depression. One way in which Roosevelt wanted to accomplish this was by creating several different federal work programs. This includes programs like the Works Progress Administration, Civilian Conservation Corp, etc.

However, conservatives felt that the economy works best when the government has little involvement. This is why they opposed these federal programs.

You might be interested in
Which of these countries is largest?<br> A. Ukraine<br> B. Malta<br> C. Russia<br> D. France
Leviafan [203]

Answer:

it's c Russia

Explanation:

hope it helps

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Help on this one plz
Yuki888 [10]

Answer:

Try c

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
What caused Civil Disobedience more?<br><br> A: Economic issues<br> B: Political beliefs
Illusion [34]

Answer:

By submitting to punishment, the civil disobedient hopes to set a moral example that will provoke the majority or the government into effecting meaningful political, social, or economic change. Under the imperative of setting a moral example, leaders of civil disobedience insist that the illegal actions be nonviolent.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who makes the rule in anarchy? What is an example? And how do the people react?
Likurg_2 [28]

Absolute chaos is what we would define as anarchy; it is essentially the reverse of order. What makes an anarchy worse would be the shocking lack of a robust legal system because there can be no laws in a society built on complete chaos, but if you're talking about a government based on anarchy, it would be a system where there is no state identity and no real central government. Somalia, to some extent, serves as the most prevalent illustration of why a government founded on anarchy is a horrible concept. Although there is a central government, its power over its territory varies. Certain sections are under the influence of the militant group Al Shabab, and the Somaliland region is attempting to declare its independence from the federal government. The country is rife with a milder but no less deadly type of anarchy due to the absence of a strong central leadership.

Anarchic societies where every individual is equally empowered are unsustainable. The individuals quickly cluster into tribal units, and without some overriding authority, it’s impossible to stop that from happening. The tribal units (or gangs, if you prefer) are run by warlords who keep each other in check until one of them gains a decisive advantage over the others, and then you’ve got the beginnings of a state.

This drama has played out countless times in the course of human history, and is still playing out in the criminal underworld to the extent that it can. That extent is limited by the fact that now there is an overriding authority with enforceable power, the legitimate state.

Thank you,

Eddie

5 0
1 year ago
Which of these colonies in British North America had a large number of plantations
Minchanka [31]

Answer:

southern colonies

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Please help me please And don’t just answer for points!
    8·1 answer
  • What side did shays rebellion have towards central government
    10·1 answer
  • As a result of the Immigration Act of 1965-
    5·2 answers
  • Until recently, the Inuit people led a nomadic existence, sheltering in igloos, the ice-block domes that are peculiar to north-c
    5·1 answer
  • "I believe that it must be the policy of the United States to support free peoples who are resisting attempted subjugation by ar
    14·2 answers
  • The necessary and proper clause _____. A) allows Congress to regulate commerce B) allows Congress to control the money supply C)
    6·2 answers
  • Which statement best summarizes how interpreted in very strict terms government have changed over time
    9·1 answer
  • Do African Merchants Make Fortunes Trading Cloth for Rum
    10·1 answer
  • The British tried to repay their debt from the French and Indian War by
    6·1 answer
  • Settlers and tribes both had effects on each other. On many trails headed west, settlers traveled in fear of attack from tribes
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!