The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Liberals and Conservatives favor greater scope of government in the following way.
Liberals support the idea that the government supports equality for the citizens. They agree on getting more government money to be used in the creation of more social programs aimed to help the ones in need. Sometimes this means increasing taxes to get the money for social programs. Liberals also favor a great scope of the government in creating legislation that supports diversity, tolerance, and immigration.
Conservatives do not agree with the idea of a government that promotes equality. They favor a greater scope of the government to promote order and respect in society, although equality is not one of their priorities. They also favored a great scope of the government to create strict legislation to support traditional American values, suppress abortion, and increases military expenditure.
Congress is viewed as the most powerful in light of the fact that it can make laws and declare war and also they can appeal to indict a President. They however don't much done in light of the fact that both the House and the Senate are comprised of various individuals from contradicting political gatherings, and frequently don't concur on different things. The founding fathers made Congress to be hard to complete something since, they just needed things to happen on the off chance that it was totally vital.
Answer: Selective optimization with compensation
Explanation: Based on the above scenario the principle at work is Selective optimization with compensation. This theory was developed by Paul and Margaret Baltes, that individuals try to maintain a balance in their lives by looking for the most effective way to compensate for physical and cognitive losses and to become better in activities they can already do well.
I believe the answer is pan-Africanism (if in connections academy then d)
