1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
valentina_108 [34]
3 years ago
9

Which group thought the colonist were adequately represented in parliament?

Social Studies
2 answers:
alina1380 [7]3 years ago
7 0
I just want points so I think it’s b
exis [7]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The Tories were the group that thought the colonists were adequately represented in Parliament, Tories are basically loyalist.

katiebugogden helped

You might be interested in
Which of the following statements is not true?
Marat540 [252]

Answer:

B. The death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus was the focal point of his incarnation.

Explanation:

The incarnation of Jesus refers to his becoming flesh. In other words, it refers to the act of Jesus being born of a woman and holding a true body. Therefore, his birth, and not his death, was the focal point of his incarnation. The incarnation was also Christ's act of humiliation, along with him undergoing the miseries of life and the death on the cross. According to Christianity, these acts are the ones that ensure the salvation of all Christians.

6 0
3 years ago
Supreme Court's decision reinforced the idea of ________ which said that the national government had
DochEvi [55]

<u>Answer: </u>

Supreme Court's decision reinforced the idea of federal supremacy which said that the national government had higher authority than the states.​

<u>Explanation: </u>

  • The Constitution of the United States, for several reasons like that of safeguarding of national and integrity, dispenses more power and authority to the federal government so that it can not only supervise the functioning of the state governments but also cease them from making laws that do not comply with the federal laws of the constitution.
  • The Supreme Court's decision clarified that the Constitution enumerates the federal government to be supreme in the comparison of powers between the state and the federal governments.
5 0
3 years ago
Pinakamahalagang katangian ng bansa
Anna [14]

Answer:

WDYEGWHDBHABDD CJDCBWUDG EWUHVWYEG

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What do you understand by SDGs​
Archy [21]

Answer:

are a global agenda with a vision of ending poverty, protecting the planet and ensuring that all people enjoy peace and prosperity

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In explaining how a person can enter a social contract and be obliged to the laws of civil society, locke invokes the notion of
marissa [1.9K]

In explaining how a person can enter a social contract and be obliged

to the laws of civil society, Locke invokes the notion of "tacit consent." Rawls, who is also a "social contract theorist," of sorts, argues that a social contract can arise only from "hypothetical consent." What is the difference between Locke's notion of tacit consent and Rawls's notion of hypothetical consent?

a) Tacit consent requires actually expressing one's consent to the terms of the contract, whereas hypothetical consent simply requires that a citizen would have given consent under certain ideal conditions.

b) One who gives tacit consent implies consent to the terms of the contract through her actions, whereas someone who gives hypothetical consent offers her explicit word on the basis of her particular desires.

c) One who gives tacit consent implicitly suggests, through her actions, that she accepts the terms of the contract, whereas to say that someone hypothetically consents means that she would have consented to the terms of the contract were she asked to do so under certain ideal conditions.

d) Tacit consent is consent given in the state of nature, whereas hypothetical consent occurs within an ideal society.

e) Tacit consent is consent given by any rational agent, irrespective of her particular desires or ends, whereas someone who gives hypothetical consent agrees to the terms of the contract based on some particular desire that she has.

Answer:

c) One who gives tacit consent implicitly suggests, through her actions, that she accepts the terms of the contract, whereas to say that someone hypothetically consents means that she would have consented to the terms of the contract were she asked to do so under certain ideal conditions.

Explanation:

The major difference between Locke's notion of tacit consent and Rawl's notion of hypothetical consent is that unlike tacit consent, someone that hypothetically consents means that the person would have likely consented to the terms of the contract if she was asked to do so under certain ideal conditions.

Tacit consent involves implicitly suggesting through actions that she accepts the terms of the contract.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Dr. Byrne is a clinical psychologist who often uses operant conditioning techniques to treat her clients. She also encourages th
    10·1 answer
  • Ep-7 what is the requirement for coast guard assistance when a vessel is aground?
    10·2 answers
  • Question 3<br> What is "compound interest"?
    7·2 answers
  • What drastic effect did contact with Herenando de Soto and his men have
    10·1 answer
  • King tuts family history
    14·1 answer
  • During what are did the first people arrive in Louisiana
    11·1 answer
  • Choose which of these statements is describing a Cultural characteristic.
    14·1 answer
  • Which statement best completes the diagram?
    5·1 answer
  • <img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=good%20behaviour%20%5C%3A%20is%20%5C%3A%20a%20%5C%3A%20behaviour%20%5C%3A%20which%20%5C%3A%20l
    10·2 answers
  • Which is the United States’ largest transfer payment program?
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!