Stapleton indicated in the <u>Critical Deaf Theory</u> that audism is a phenomenon that is socially constructed and posits that audism occurs regularly. This is closely linked to deficit error.
<h3>What is Audism?</h3>
This is the practice of discriminating against people who have hearing challenges. This prejudice may occur in the following ways:
- trying to assist people who are deaf to communicate:
- asking a person with hearing challenges to read one's lips or write against their wish or preferred mode of communication
- refusing to get an interpreter at the request of a deaf person.
Audism is very similar to Deficit Error.
Please see the link below for more about Deficit Error:
brainly.com/question/8412510
<h3><u>
Full question:</u></h3>
Why is persistent unemployment a possibility in the Keynesian model but NOT in the classical model?
A) The Keynesian model assumes that the level of real GDP is inflexible.
B) The Keynesian model assumes that people work for motives other than those of earning an income for themselves and supporting a family.
C) The Keynesian model assumes that workers can lose their jobs to foreign competition during economic downturns.
D) The Keynesian model assumes that nominal wages are inflexible downward.
<h3><u>
Answer:</u></h3>
The Keynesian model assumes that nominal wages are inflexible downward - is persistent unemployment a possibility in the Keynesian model
<h3><u>
Explanation:</u></h3>
The classical model is quite the usual microeconomic principles. Keynes claimed that the classical model is not common. In the classical model, the basis for the rationalizing is notional demand and supply, which implies market equilibrium. Keynes proposed the idea of aggregate demand, the overall demand for products and services in the economy.
Keynes supposed that the unemployment force persists regularly. Keynes was suspicious that the economic dominance of demand and supply drive the economy to a common equilibrium. Rising government spending or cutting taxes will boost aggregate demand.
<u />
People were able to specialize and trade, which made their city wealthier, stronger, and even more likely to make allies. :)
Answer: B) groups have fewer than eight people
Explanation: people reduce their own contribution when they are working in groups. As part of group,when members reduce their input,especially in an existing educational context,these phenomenon may be problematic
In a class room activities. Recent study states that to prevent social loafing from occurring creation of smaller group of three or eight,will produce a better result. The result of individual who works in a smaller group produces more positive result
