British forces were opposed by the forces from the Thirteen Colonies, or the colonies; of whom there were below 80. Many are known by name, such as John Parker and William Heath,
The correct answer is Emile Durkheim
Durkheim determines the social fact as the central object of investigation in this new scientific field. The social fact is understood as a “thing” that exerts a force of coercion on the subjects, regardless of their individual will or action. The social fact imposes itself in the direction of society for the individual and is established in a way to homogenize and standardize particular behaviors, ensuring that they are collective. Purposely, Durkheim calls the social fact a “thing” to emphasize that it is an object in the scientific sense, that is, something that can be observed, defined and explained by the social scientist.
Answer:
B. Marbury v. Madison
Explanation:
Marbury v. Madison can be regarded as an icon that helps to give more strength to the federal judiciary through the establishment of power of judicial review, these is a medium whereby there could be declaration of
legislation by federal courts as along with executive as well with administrative actions and the inconsistent that is associated with the U.S. Constitution and therefore null and void.This judicial review which was supreme Court case, can be regarded as one that was strengthen in 1803 by
Marbury vs Madison, this can be explained as how the courts are been given power so they can make law as well as other amendments which are regarded as been on violation of United States constitution
Answer:
A, B, E
Explanation:
A: Euthanasia must be legal for it to be morally <em>and</em> legally permissible. If it is illegal, it's basically considered murder in the area.
B: Euthanasia means to relieve someone of their pain by ending their life. This is a very grave decision that has irreversible consequences. If there are other ways to relieve the patient's suffering that are much less harmful, they should come before ending the patient's life.
C: Ending a life for the benefit of others is immoral because it is an irreversible consequence. You are taking the life of another human for other people to temporarily feel better. That is not okay and should never be considered as a justifiable factor.
D: You would be taking the life of someone else to make yourself an exemplar for others. That's basically exploiting their death for your benefit. That is immoral because you are not considering the best interest and well-being of the patient.
E: The doctor and patient must have a previous agreement to provide euthanasia because if there was no such agreement, it would be against or without the patient's consent. This would be immoral because you are not taking into consideration the decisions and rights of the patient.
-
These are my opinions, but it's up to you to decide the best options based on your morals and social customs. Good luck!
Answer:
Explanation:
Elizabeth should concentrate on making pie because she has a comparative advantage over Benjamin in pie making while Benjamin has comparative advantage in cake baking.
According to the Ricardian model of comparative advantage, countries should concentrate in the production of goods they have comparative advantage in making and exchange or import goods they do not have comparative advantage in making. This is the basis of trade between nations according to the Ricardian model.
