1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Elan Coil [88]
3 years ago
15

A judge cites precedent when delivering a ruling in a case. In doing this, he is harkening back to a practice begun in which set

of laws?
Law
1 answer:
Sphinxa [80]3 years ago
5 0

Answer: C. Common law

Explanation:

Since the judge cites precedent when delivering a ruling in a case, then he is harkening back to a practice that was begun in a set of common laws.

Common law refers to a body of unwritten laws that was based on legal precedents that was established by the courts. It should be noted that common law influences the process of decision-making in cases whereby it's difficult to determine the outcome of the case based on the written rules of law.

You might be interested in
Which of the following best explains an impact of the increasing number of imports to the United States?
frez [133]

Answer:

answer is D

Explanation:

There is a wider variety of goods available at cheaper prices.

6 0
2 years ago
10. What is lobbying?
NNADVOKAT [17]

Answer:

seek to influence a politician or public official on an issue

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A convenience store has been robbed late at night. The cashier has been found shot behind the counter. Video surveillance of the
Ksivusya [100]

Answer:

I think no D

if wrong correct me pls

6 0
3 years ago
The Mail Coverage Form is always written on a reporting form
fiasKO [112]
D. 30 days. hope this helps
4 0
3 years ago
Must all elements of probable cause exist before a lawful arrest can be made?
kkurt [141]

householdThereWhichever,

Probable cause is a requirement found in the Fourth Amendment that must usually be met before the police make an arrest, conduct a search, or receive a warrant.

“Probable cause” is a legal standard applied to the police and prosecutors; individual citizens don’t “get” probable cause.

Police must demonstrate sufficient probable cause to believe that there is evidence of a crime to obtain a search warrant or an arrest warrant.

Prosecutors must demonstrate sufficient probable cause as to every element of a charged crime to proceed with filing charges and beginning the trial process.

There is no clear legal definition of what constitutes “probable cause” — it’s somewhere between suspicion and proof. The closest you’ll come is the 1949 case Brinegar v. the United States in which the Supreme Court described it thus:

“…where the facts and circumstances within the officers' knowledge, and of which they have reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient in themselves to warrant a belief by a man of reasonable caution that a crime is being committed.”

Please imagine a situation when someone very healthy falls ill all of a sudden and the reason is not immediately known. You take that person to a doctor and the doctor will ask you to identify the root cause of the illness, generally as under:

type of food the person ate recently

what liquids he/she consumed

whether he/she traveled recently and had food from outside,

whether affected by climate change,

whether any drastic change in his/her daily routine etc.

any other likely change in his/her work schedule

The above list could be the probable causes from which the doctor can identify the root cause for the illness.

II. Similarly, when an inexplicable accident happens(the driver cannot find out the cause), several questions like the following may be asked:

was there break failure

did one of the tires burst

was the driver distracted by someone(suddenly crossing the road etc.)

did the driver doze off(sleep for a while)

The above can be considered as the probable causes, to arrive at the root cause of the accident.

This is cause and this is the effect is a highly scientific approach and it is hardly possible in less than 1% of our day-to-day life despite our 99% dependence on only science-originated things. It is a decision without measurements, proper logic errors, etc., we are forced to land in probability and possibility. Maximum experience is in medical decisions, especially in new upcoming nuisance topics like a corona. Only probable cause is guessed. There is nothing when a patient comes with corona. Whichever is the cause treat him with your best tools as a doctor? Those who work in huge projects of prevention, curtailing, “stop-the-spread” projects will break their heads.

A simple example from a household happening. The jewel kept on a chair just temporarily is missing. 1. Somebody should have kept it safely 2. Somebody should have pocketed it on a non-returnable basis 3. The servants should have taken full benefit of our negligence and we should start searching for what more is stolen 4. The jeweler whom we told that we have some repair work should have come and taken it for repair, we telephone and find out. 5. Government announced gold control when Morarji was P.M. Some excise officer should have read it now, noticed our careless and taken it.

Which out of these is most probable?

Nothing! The jewel was under the cushion of the chair.

Two servants were dismissed forever. There is no excise department connection with that jewel. Nobody can keep it more safely than what the jewel can keep its good self. That jeweler has left the city two years ago.

All guesswork done is included in only probable causes, many cause foolish. Some are probable. But the actual happening has not chosen that. It is the house that has chosen those causes. The scientific or guess ability of the house is clear to them at least.

Probable cause is a guesswork cause that may be or may not be tallying with the truth. The correct guess is 100% probable!

The jewel missing cause is 0% probable!

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Taco bell implied contract
    8·1 answer
  • One study examined 100 younths in philadeplphia and found that high levels of what in the body was associated with higher crime
    9·1 answer
  • Which is an effect of the Identity Theft and Assumption Deference Act of 1998? Allows federal agencies to fight identity theft C
    10·1 answer
  • Under which circumstance is an appeals court most likely to rule that a defendant has been denied the right to assistance of
    9·1 answer
  • Can animal wildlife protection be an amendment, or do amendment have to affect humans?
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following individual is NOT considered a U.S. citizen?
    12·1 answer
  • What are the four items you identified that would be included in an Incident Action Plan? What is the first action you would tak
    6·1 answer
  • 3. Compare and contrast the beginnings, jurisdiction and duties of State courts (Ch. 4) and Federal Courts (Ch. 3)?
    12·1 answer
  • Who on this app is turning 14 in 2022
    14·2 answers
  • List two pathways from the Business Management and Administration Career Cluster. ​
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!