Answer: gender based voilence in the sence that either a woman can be a victim of voilence or a man as well
We shouldn't only see it that only women can be victims of voilence, in the sense that there are men with women's bone in them that the can't help but fall victim of those women who could be mistaken as men in the way they treat the opposite gender
Gender based violence isn't when the opposite gender raises his or her hands on you but on small cases like a woman who cherishes to be a landlord where as the husband has nothing to his name, this woman is voilating her husband's right which may cause the man to become violent to his wife
Explanation:
Answer:
The exclusionary rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution. The decision in Mapp v. Ohio established that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence gained from an unreasonable search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The decision in Miranda v. Arizona established that the exclusionary rule applies to improperly elicited self-incriminatory statements gathered in violation of the Fifth Amendment, and to evidence gained in situations where the government violated the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel. However, the rule does not apply in civil cases, including deportation hearings. See INS v. Lopez-Mendoza.
Answer:
A long handwritten ransom note was found in the home. Her father, John, found the girl's body in the basement of their house about seven hours after she had been reported missing. She had sustained a broken skull from a blow to the head and had been strangled; a garrote was found tied around her neck.
Explanation:
