<em>"</em><em>the </em><em>missile's </em><em>trajectory</em><em> </em><em>was</em><em> </em><em>preset.</em><em>"</em>
<em>;</em><em>-</em><em>/</em>
Answer:
1 . I have had lunch .
2. He has had lunch .
3. I had had lunch before you came.
Explanation:
This is one of the most confused about combinations as per my experience .I would firstly tell a bit of grammar part and then clarify with real day to day usage .
THE CONFUSION IF AT ALL COMES IS BECAUSE OF TWO DIFFERENT USAGES OF WORD “HAVE” . THEY LOOK AND SOUND LIKE SAME BUT PLEASE TREAT THEM DIFFERENTLY . So let's separate them like one of them is same like “ “AM,ARE,WILL,SHALL, “ the helping or auxiliary verbs ,and the second. “have “ is just like “ drive, eat, drink, watch” the main verb “ or I prefer to call “ Action”.
Answer:
no
Explanation: it's not a proper sentence.
False because it can be a contextualized as you want it to or however the teacher wants it to be
Answer:
Hmm, I'm not sure what type of techniques would describe those phrases, but I know a word that does.
Explanation:
platitude
"a remark or statement, especially one with a moral content, that has been used too often to be interesting or thoughtful."
examples:
"Everything happens for a reason."
"Time heals all wounds."
