Answer:
large,home to thousands of people
Two ways in which federal judges differ from members of Congress and the President are:
- Federal judges are appointed and confirmed, while members of Congress and the president are elected.
- Federal judges can serve for life, while members of Congress and the president are elected for one or more terms.
<h3 /><h3>How are federal judges different from members of Congress?</h3>
Members of Congress need to be elected to be able to serve their constituents much like Presidents are elected. They also serve a certain number of terms when they are elected.
Federal judges on the other hand, can serve for life and are appointed by the President with the consent of the Senate which means that they don't to vote.
Find out more on the appointment of federal judges at brainly.com/question/7576271
#SPJ1
The correct answer is A) Caste system
The caste system has been implemented at different times in history and different places of all over the world. Some examples of it are the separation into white people and other ethnics in the European colonialist empires.
The most important caste system in the world is maybe the Indian caste system which is a very old and widespread tradition especially in the rural sectors of the country.
The <em>caste system</em> have the following characteristics:
- It is a social system in which personal status is awarded for life, therefore in societies organized by castes the different strata are closed and the individual must remain in the social stratum in which he was born.
- The characteristics that differentiate the different social strata are: race, religion, etc. that he accidentally acquires at birth and with which he can not change.
- Caste societies can be seen as a class society in which social class is acquired at birth. Caste systems reject close relationships with members of other castes.
- That "purity" of castes is usually maintained by an inbreeding rule, marriage must be between persons of the same social group.
Answer:
They were more organized and well supplied at Concord.
Explanation:
Hi there,
In the battle at Lexington, the colonists were very unprepared for the well-trained British army and outnumbered. However, the colonists were ready to fight at Concord since they were better supplied and knew the British were approaching. Their preparedness was clearly shown because the colonists were able to have 400 militiamen and forced the 100 British troops into retreat.
Hope this answer gives you an idea of the differences in the two battles. Cheers.
