<span>The answer to the question stated above is liquidity.
The ease with which an asset can be converted quickly into cash with little or no loss of purchasing power is liquidity.
>>>Money is said to be perfectly liquid, whereas other assets have a lesser degree of liquidity.</span>
Answer: Option 'b' is correct.
Explanation:
The lowest point on a purely competitive firm's short run supply curve corresponds to the minimum point on its MC curve.
As we know the relation between ATC, AVC, AFC, MC.
1) when AC > MC then, MC rises,
2) When AC = MC, then AC reaches its minimum point.
3) When AC < MC , then MC falls.
And MC falls at higher rate than AC,
So, MC reaches its minimum point first and it is the lowest point for perfect competition.
Hence, Option 'b' is correct.
Answer:
The correct answer is B
Explanation:
Resources are used efficiently in the sunhat market because when marginal social benefit equals marginal social cost, total surplus is maximized. Thus, From the given four options only the option B is the correct option.
MSC = Marginal Social cost
MSB = Marginal Social Benefit
It is becuase in the competitive market, the quantity that is supplied in the market in same to the quantity which is demanded.
<u>Answer:</u>
The correct answer for this is: Gross Rent Multiplier.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The type of a simplified alternative to capitalization of net income that does not take into account bad debts or expenses is called Gross Rent Multiplier (GMR).
Gross Rent Multiplier is used to find the approximate net incomes that does not include any bad debts or expenses.
Also, it is considered as the quickest tool to estimate the values, such as of a building.
Explanation:
Let’s explore one by one as proposed:
An oil cartel raises oil prices: all prices in the oil-related products will increase making it more expensive for companies to be able to afford employees. As the US economy is heavily based on oil import and consumption, the unemployment rate (let´s call it UR from now on) would increase. Countries that export more than import could benefit from this scenario.
The U.S. dollar gains value against foreign currencies: It would be more expensive to produce goods in the US as its currency becomes stronger. Hence companies could choose to produce overseas, increasing the UR. One of the factors that attract investments is a cheap currency, meaning that a company could operate there at lower costs than anywhere else.
American consumers expect higher income in the future: As fights about average salary would arise between employees and companies, igniting even sindicalization, its proper to think that the same as above could occur; companies could choose to produce overseas in countries less demanding of labor rights and income, such as China provinces (I would recommend for you to watch American Factory, a awarded Netflix documentary about that subject).
Brazil experiences economic growth and increases its demand for U.S. exports: as I said in the first alternative, a country that has increased or more expensive exports could benefit from that creating more jobs, in this case decreasing the UR. If Brazil demands more US products, more has to be produced by the country, which would mean more people employed in this attractive sector.
U.S. real estate values rise: to be honest, it only affects indirectly. As housing becomes more expensive, people have to work more to be able to afford housing. That would mean they seeking better-paying jobs or in the absence of those being homeless of at least unable to buy a home. We could argue that the UR would decrease because it becomes more expensive to afford housing and hence people would migrate more but that’s a long shot rationale.
