I wholeheartedly agree and think it’s practically self-evident.
Here’s an excellent example from history.
For 28 years, the Berlin Wall separated East Berlin from West Berlin and was the most heavily militarized border crossing in the Western hemisphere. In 1989, during a press conference with western media, Gunther Schabowski was handed a note explaining a change in policy governing border crossing. Several discussions took place about making a show of opening the border between East and West Germany, but nobody informed Schabowski.
At the end of the press conference, he appears to have remembered the note belatedly, and read it verbatim—which was not what was intended. When asked about when the border would open, he assumed it was immediate.
The reality of course was that East Germany had no intention of opening the border, and certainly not immediately.
Within hours, the border crossing was practically buried under thousands of East Germans eager to be reunited with their families and other loved ones after 28 years on the press conference, which had been broadcast live.
The East Germans believed what they were told: Schabowski said immediately, and they intended to go immediately.
Border guards kept calling for instructions, until finally, they relented.
Perception became reality, and the border between East and West Berlin opened, spelling the de facto end of the separation of Germany.
273 viewsView 2 Upvoters · Answer requested by Never Wong
Related Questions (More Answers Below)
The answer is b. false.
In the absence of a partnership agreement on fixed duration, the Partnership Act 1890 may apply.
<span>Under the Act, a partnership will be automatically dissolved if: a partner dies</span>
<span>· </span>a partner becomes bankrupt;
<span>· </span>the court orders it to be dissolved;
<span>· </span>it's illegal to carry on the business of the partnership;
<span>· </span><span>the partnership was created meet a goal and this specific objective or the project is complete; or</span>
<span>a partner gives notice to dissolve the partnership to the other partners. The </span>
Answer:
Cost to retail ratio = 57.05%
Explanation:
Particulars Cost Retail
Beginning Inventory $46,000 $66,000
Add: Purchases $213,000 $406,000
Less: Purchases Return $7,000 $9,000
Freight In $15,558 -
Net Markups - $6,400
Good Avail. for Sales (Without markdowns) $267,558 $469,000
Cost to retail ratio = $267,558/$469,000
Cost to retail ratio = 0.570486
Cost to retail ratio = 57.05%
A simple discount note results in i<span>nterest that are deducted in advance, this can just be simply called a discount. </span><span> It is usually being confused with markdown. </span><span>Discount is a deduction in the price of a product base on the purchase of the customer while markdown is a reduction of price based on inability to be sold. </span>
<span>At the tactical level of war the combatant commanders prepare all national instruments of power for war or conflict coordination the application of all instruments of national power with the actions of force. Principles and guidance also apply when needed.</span>
