Evidence that can be used to modify or refute what Stannard said about Columbus would be (D) examples of long-term benefits for people in Europe and Asia that resulted from the voyages by Columbus.
<h3>What did Stannard think of Columbus?</h3>
David Stannard thinks very lowly of Christopher Columbus as a result of the latter's crimes in North America which included the killing and mutilating of Native Americans.
David Stannard believed that the exploration of the Americas brought only long-term pain to Native Americans so a view that would refute this would have to show descriptions that Native Americans enjoyed some long term benefits thanks to Columbus.
Find out more on Christopher Columbus at brainly.com/question/15581111
#SPJ1
Answer:
They provided trading routes, also helped people travel, it provided electricity through hydroelectric dams, and last but not least, it was a source of drinking water.
Explanation:
I know you said 2, but I gave you 4 for incase you want to use more.
I think they could give woman a chance to work instead of slavery because back then half the population was just doing chores.
Answer:
High tariffs caused other nations to place taxes on US farm products which lost them sales and caused the prices to go down but industry benefited because of the low prices and the high tariff, therefore the Wall Street benefited again.
Explanation:
