The Articles of Confederation were far too weak to meet the needs of the newly created United States because of the massive decentralization the Articles contained.
They did not give the government any right to tax the people, and had to ask the states for taxes, and the states were not keen to pay them unless it benefited them. Often found were states not contributing to the pay of the Continental Army because it was not in their territory and defending them. This was also the reason Valley Forge was a disastrous winter for the Continental Army.
The Constitution fixed this by mandating budgets and making sure the states did in fact pay dues to the Gov't, later amended with (the supposed temporary) Federal income tax, starting after The Great War.
The other big failure is the lack of a requirement delegates be there, and the fact it requires every state to vote yes, an amendment to let the Confederation place import taxes to help pay the army was a washed failure because Rhode Island feared having their economy impacted horribly as they were so small they only had trade.
The New Constitution fixed this by making it so 3/4 of the states had to vote Aye to an amendment to the Constitution itself, and made the Federal Government itself handle passes legislation at it's own level with a majority rules, rather than all.
A four episode series from Extra History delve with a good amount of detail as to the Articles' other short comings, and what I elaborated on. Would strongly recommend a watch: https://youtu.be/C6rHSiN0vKk
religious beliefs and practices fascinated him as a child.
this quote was very important. this means that a child is barely obey his religion if he is not told to, so jesus was fascinated by religious beliefs and practices without he has been told by anyone. this made him jesus
Options:
A) The state and federal governments would not have been able to coexist.
B) People were concerned that the government would infringe on individual freedoms.
C) Local governments were worried that they wouldn't have any power.
<span>
D) There was a need for each branch of government to "check" the others.
The answer is option B "</span><span>People were concerned that the government would infringe on individual freedoms." The bill of rights are article's that give people there induvial rights and</span> so people thought that the government would change those rights therefore changing laws that had to be followed. Bill of rights contain amendments that could not be change said but the original founding fathers of our country. Even though they can't, it's still possible.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
The answer is D.
Explanation:
Women who are educated would help the state because their talents would be advantageous.
Answer: One major difference is that King's believes that slavery didn't play a role, while Burns' does. A historical event that could support King's is when Congress established the Freedmen's Bureau in 1865. This provided aid to African Americans in their transition from slavery to freedom. A historical event that could support Burns' is Dred Scott v. Sandford. The case in 1857 declared that slaves and blacks descended from slaves and were not American citizens and cannot sue, so this could have led to outrage and war.
