The factors that led to the revolution in 1917 are all the given choices. Explanations are given in each.
<span>a Nobility owned all the land.
There was no agricultural land reform and peasants were treated badly.
b The military was a strong supporter of Czar Nicholas II.
There are instances that military abuse to people are not persecuted
c Food was in short supply.
People are hungry and there is social unrest.
d Russia was involved in World War I Thousands of people were killed on Bloody Sunday.
Russia was involved in the killings also called as Red Sunday
e Czar Nicholas II abdicated. Wages were low for the working class
Poor working conditions of the workers.
I hope this helped you.</span>
The roman catholic and the eastern orthodox churches split due to people having different opinions (what they believed in) in other words the greek orthodox church was made to sever all ties,thus the reason the churches split.
Answer:
They both had different political views
Athens had a more free life style but Spartans started to train for the military at the age of 7.
Spartans didn't care about education if it wasn't about warfare.
Athens cared about grace and beauty
Athens treated women badly; they were to be silently raising their children. In Sparta, however, they had military training, participated in sports events, and overall had more rights than women of all other empires of Ancient Greece.
Explanation:
Answer:
the answer is gold, silk, and spices I think
The correct answer is B. The potential for the results to improve the world is not evident.
Explanation:
Utilitarianism is a philosophical perspective ad theory that focuses on increasing the well-being and happiness of individuals while decreasing suffering or pain. Also, for utilitarians, the practical uses and results prevail over other factors. Due to this, utilitarians might argue science is not valuable because a big part of it is understanding how natural phenomenons work, and this might be considered to lack practical uses or to help the world improve. Thus, the reason for a utilitarian to argue against the value of science is that "the potential for the results to improve the world is not evident".
