All categories

3 years ago

Why did the Supreme Court ruling in Korematsu v. United States (1944) anger supporters of civil liberties

History

2 answers:

Strike441 [17]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

The Supreme Court ruling in Korematsu v. United States in 1944 angered supporters of civil liberties because it was a law that arbitrarily restricted the rights of many American citizens, for the simple fact of belonging to a certain ethnic group, the Japanese-Americans.

During World War II, following the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and the American entry into the war, a racist wave began within the United States government, targeting mainly Japanese-Americans, and to a lesser extent, against Germans and Italians.

Thus, Japanese people's property in America began to be confiscated, sending these people to detention camps as they feared they might support the Japanese government in the war. Fred Korematsu, born in America and citizen of the nation, claimed this situation before the court, saying that it violated the Fifth Amendment.

The Supreme Court, in its ruling, determined that this situation should be maintained as it responded to questions of defense and national security, endorsing the curtailment and subjugation of the rights of thousands of innocent American citizens.

djverab [1.8K]3 years ago

3 0

Because it made the internment of certain American citizens legitimate.

You might be interested in

What are the natural boundaries of mesopotamia

Studentka2010 [4]

Mesopotamia is between two rivers: Tigirs and Euphrates

8 0

3 years ago

¿Cuál es la pregunta de investigación del siguiente tema de investigación?

alexandr1967 [171]

Answer:

I don't understand what this is asking

Explanation:

explain more please

3 0

2 years ago

Plsss helppp will give brainliest!! :)

Crank

The best answers are A and C (they claimed vast areas of land for Spain and they brought much financial gain to Spain).

3 0

2 years ago

What steps did the Catholic Church take to reform itself in the wake of the Protestant reformation (two examples)

Ipatiy [6.2K]

The Catholic Church responded to the Protestant Reformation thru a Counter reform, rebuilding the Church by finishing corruption in all forms. This is obvious thru three examples:

1. Ending monastic corruption.

2. Implementing formal schooling for priests, especially the Jesuits.

3. Reaffirming the magisterium of the Church in topics of biblical interpretation.

<h3>What do you mean by Reformation?</h3>

The Reformation (as a substitute named the Protestant Reformation or the European Reformation)become a primary motion inside Western Christianity in 16th-century Europe that posed a spiritual and political challenge to the Catholic Church.

Therefore, The Catholic Church responded to the Protestant Reformation thru a Counter reform, rebuilding the Church by finishing corruption in all forms.

Learn more about Reformation:

brainly.com/question/369126

#SPJ1

3 0

2 years ago

Choose one of these issues to research:

Ulleksa [173]

What is your chosen issue? My chosen issue is bullying.

Why is this issue a problem in your state or local area ? Bullying in many countries is a big problem. In Peru statistics are not so clear but when you read the news you notice that number of students beiing bullied is increasing. This goes from physical agressions to insults. Fortunately there is awareness of the problem and most of the people know that has to be stopped.

What government agencies and citizen groups would likely to address this issue?

There are many things that can be done for example parents, school staff, and other adults in the community can help children prevent bullying by talking about it. Also, it is a good idea to build a safe school environment, and create a community-wide bullying prevention strategy.

What is the ultimate goal to address the issue? The ultimate goal must be zero bullying and to do that it is necessary team work I mean parents, authorities, the school system must be involved and to know that the problem is solved it is important to use statistics to monitor the issue.

What are the public policy alternatives to address the issue? The public alternatives are working very hard in creating a strategy to overcome the problem. The strategy can be designed to give psychological help to the victims and to give lectures in schools and also to monitor the problem with statistics.

What is one positive outcome and one negative outcome for each possible policy alternative?

One positive alternative is that the strategy ends up solving the problem one negative alternative is that victims probably end up having psychologycal problems or maybe phisical injuries if bullying is not attacked with a good strategy.

What is the best plan to get the policy enacted?

It has to be team work, I mean eveybody has to be involved and it has to be a good strategy for the short and the long run.

How can citizens get involved to help enact the policy? Parents, children and aurhorities must create awareness that a problem like this exist and must be solved.

8 0

3 years ago