Answer:
The correct answer is c. Marginal analysis
Explanation:
Marginal analysis is a technique you can apply when you are comparing some options. We can say this analysis is an examination of the additional benefits of an activity compared to the additional costs incurred by that same activity. Using this technique you can maximize the potential profits.
The additional cost versus the additional benefit of a decision. In this case, Bill and Alma are analyzing if living 10 miles closer to their workplaces ( benefit) is worth the extra $25,000 in the cost of the house(cost). This is marginal analysis.
Answer:
b. minimum prices are enforced
Explanation:
The manufacturer of certain products deals with their distributors by exploiting the market failures to negotiate ceiling and minimum prices with the threat of not purchase if the agreement is not validated.
This is done to prevent competition between reseller for the price. This makes the reseller profitable and therefore, the manufactured as well.
Answer:
Anne Mullens committed embezzlement.
Explanation:
Embezzlement is defined as misappropriation of funds by someone with whom funds have been entrusted.
It is a theft as the money does not belong to the perpetrator. The perpetrator is only entrusted with funds.
One of the conditions for embezzlement is an existence of a fiduciary (trust) relationship between parties.
In the given case, Anne Mullens pocketed $57 cash from recorded amount instead of recording 57$ customer's payment via check. Instead she included the customer's check in the money to be taken to bank.
This is embezzlement of funds by Anne.
Answer:
$685,000
Explanation:
First and foremost, the formula for determining the contribution margin ratio can be used to determine the target dollars sales as shown below:
contribution margin ratio=contibution margin/sales revenue
contribution margin ratio=16%
contribution margin required=pretax income+fixed costs
contribution margin required=$71,200+$38,400=$109,600
16%=$109,600/sales revenue
16%*sales revenue=$109,600
sales revenue=$109,600/16%
sales revenue=$685,000
Answer:
C. Compensatory damages and consequential damages.
Explanation:
The reason is that the company can only sue Santa for its compensatory damage of paying 15% extra and consequential damages which are only claimable if the party to contract knows that not performing the contract will contribute to consequential damages which are here losses of sales which amount to 25% of sales.