Answer:
Debra Medina claimed that nullification was possible by state laws that could neutralize federal laws. She based her claim on the 10th Amendment, which establishes that any power not constitutionally granted to the federal government can be held by the states.
Explanation:
The Constitution doesn´t enable the nullification of federal laws by the states, and several academics have stated that it could be illegal since the Supremacy Clause pronounces federal laws as the supreme national law. So nullification would overthrow the constitutional interpretation held for 200 years.
Let us also remember that Gov. Rick Perry, who supported nullification, had already skipped the nullification issue by starting a debate about secession. This debate is a reminder of the time when state rejection of racial integration had to be stopped by the Supreme Court case Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka.
The correct answer is it is messy and looks hastily abandoned.
Mrs. Wright was accused of murdering her husband, and so the police came to her house to investigate. They enter the kitchen and find it very filthy, with dirty rags hanging all over the place, and dishes in the sink still unwashed. They immediately connect the place with Mrs. Wright being a bad housewife and woman in general and don't even try to investigate any further into why she did what she did until the townswomen help them.<span />
They were important because they made up a part of what is going on today, Hope this helps :)
