Determine two pairs of polar coordinates for the point (4, -4) with 0° ≤ θ < 360°.

Mathematics

2 answers:

grin007 [14]3 years ago

7 0

(4√2, 225°), (-4√2, 45°)

KatRina [158]3 years ago

4 0

The point (4, -4) lies in Quadrant IV. Since we are interested only in positive angles, we choose 315 degrees with a radius (magnitude) of 4√2. That automatically eliminates Answer Choices A, B and C, so all we have to do now is to verify that (-4√2, 135 degrees) also represents (4, -4). It does: Going to Quadrant II with angle 135 degrees, and then using -4√2 as the magnitude, takes us to Quadrant IV.

Thus, D is the correct answer.

You might be interested in

Formulate a rational algebraic equation of the problem

liubo4ka [24]

Answer:

comment the question I will try to solve it.....

5 0

3 years ago

Suppose each of the following data sets is a simple random sample from some population. For each dataset, make a normal QQ plot.

adell [148]

Answer:

a) For this case the histogram is not too skewed and we can say that is approximately symmetrical so then we can conclude that this dataset is similar to a normal distribution

b) For this case the data is skewed to the left and we can't assume that we have the normality assumption.

c) This last case the histogram is not symmetrical and the data seems to be skewed.

Step-by-step explanation:

For this case we have the following data:

(a)data = c(7,13.2,8.1,8.2,6,9.5,9.4,8.7,9.8,10.9,8.4,7.4,8.4,10,9.7,8.6,12.4,10.7,11,9.4)

We can use the following R code to get the histogram

> x1<-c(7,13.2,8.1,8.2,6,9.5,9.4,8.7,9.8,10.9,8.4,7.4,8.4,10,9.7,8.6,12.4,10.7,11,9.4)

> hist(x1,main="Histogram a)")

The result is on the first figure attached.

For this case the histogram is not too skewed and we can say that is approximately symmetrical so then we can conclude that this dataset is similar to a normal distribution

(b)data = c(2.5,1.8,2.6,-1.9,1.6,2.6,1.4,0.9,1.2,2.3,-1.5,1.5,2.5,2.9,-0.1)

> x2<- c(2.5,1.8,2.6,-1.9,1.6,2.6,1.4,0.9,1.2,2.3,-1.5,1.5,2.5,2.9,-0.1)

> hist(x2,main="Histogram b)")

The result is on the first figure attached.

For this case the data is skewed to the left and we can't assume that we have the normality assumption.

(c)data = c(3.3,1.7,3.3,3.3,2.4,0.5,1.1,1.7,12,14.4,12.8,11.2,10.9,11.7,11.7,11.6)

> x3<-c(3.3,1.7,3.3,3.3,2.4,0.5,1.1,1.7,12,14.4,12.8,11.2,10.9,11.7,11.7,11.6)

> hist(x3,main="Histogram c)")

The result is on the first figure attached.

This last case the histogram is not symmetrical and the data seems to be skewed.