Answer:
Explanation:
1. There are few theories on why the books of Maccabees are not part of Jewish scriptures.
The first one is the date; it is believed that the Council of Jamnia only took books that existed for a long time and were unofficially considered canonical when canonizing Hebrew Bible. The events in the old testament go from the Creation to the book of Esther, happening during the rebuilding of the Temple. For them, The Maccabean Revolt was the recent event, happening after these mentioned ones.
The more probable reason, however, lies in the separation of Judaism on two fractures – <em>the Pharisees</em> and<em> theSadducees</em>. While Pharisees lean towards ideas of oral law and tradition, Sadducees reject them and follow the written Torah as the only canon. The Maccabees are believed to be descendant from Pharisees, and quite possibly excluded from canonization by a council of Jamnia because of this reason.
However, the books of Maccabees are still valuable historical account, the one because of which Hanukah is celebrated.
2. Because of the evidence presented above, the answer is - Yes, it is true that the first and second Maccabee books were written as part the Jewish history.
The old world monkey that became s<span>pecial interest to paleoanthropologists because it lives in savannahs like those in which we expect ancestral humans may have lived is: </span><span>baboons
the </span>paleoanthropologists paid a lot of interest to this animal because their behavior and decision-making process is very close to human.
For example, in their baboons' group, there will be some type of leaders that lead through tyranny and some leaders that lead through cooperation and understanding. (just like humans)
On top of that, many of the baboon leaders that led with tyranny often betrayed by its subordinate and killed while sleeping (again, just like human)
First of all, it is necessary to understand the concept of monopoly, which is the event of a single person or enterprise controlling the supply of a particular commodity. Following that logic, a natural monopoly can be understood as a given industry wherein high infrastructural costs and other barriers to entry relative to the size of the market give the largest - usually the first supplier - in the market a virtually overwhelming advantage over competitors.
Therefore, it is possible to affirm that the lesta likely choice to be allowed to function as a natural monopoly in a society economy is food distribution, which can be performed by several different enterprises/individuals.
On the other hand, watershed management, electricity generation and hazardous waste disposal, due to their high cost of capital, creating economies of scale that are large in relation to the size of the market.
