Led by Alexander Hamilton, albeit secretly at first, the Federalists were the first political party of the United States. They supported the Constitution, and attempted to convince the States to ratify the document. Hamilton, along with John Jay and James Madison, anonymously published a series of essays known as the Federalist Papers under the pseudonym "Publius."
Both Hamilton and Madison argued that the Constitution didn't need a Bill of Rights, that it would create a "parchment barrier" that limited the rights of the people, as opposed to protecting them. However, they eventually made the concession and announced a willingness to take up the matter of the series of amendments which would become the Bill of Rights. Without this compromise, the Constitution may never have been ratified by the States.
Surprisingly enough, it was Federalist James Madison who eventually presented the Bill of Rights to Congress despite his former stance on the issue.
The king had power, but not as much as parliament.
Strict scrutiny, moderate scrutiny, and logical basis scrutiny are three tests.
To evaluate the legitimacy of differential treatment based on a suspicious classification, a Strict scrutiny test is applied (race, ethnic origin, religion).
In free exercise clause cases, the court previously applied strict scrutiny more frequently, as in Sherbert v. Verner (1963) and Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972), but the Employment Division v. Smith decision altered the approach (1990).
When a plaintiff accuses the government of discrimination, the courts frequently use strict scrutiny. The law must have been carefully crafted to satisfy a "compelling governmental interest" and have been passed by the legislature in order to pass rigorous scrutiny.
A law impacting a fundamental right must have a compelling state purpose in order to pass under the Strict Scrutiny criterion. In order to accomplish the goal or interest of the government, the law must also be carefully crafted.
To know more about Strict Scrutiny refer to: brainly.com/question/11550284
#SPJ1
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there is no link to watch the video and there is no name of the video to search for it, we can say that companies like Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Amazon were/are successful at the time because they were innovative companies that were ahead of their competence. In the case of Sears, the company sent salesmen to offer the catalogs and products of the company and paid special attention to customer satisfaction. That is how Sears could create an emporium, opening new stores in most parts of the United States.
Amazon also was a very innovative company, now, in the modern era of technology. Amazon was a step beyond its competitors, creating a service culture where everything was on time, guaranteeing customer satisfaction, from the transaction online, until the product was delivered at home or office.
A. The attempted extermination of European Jews and others by the Nazis.
