It determines wether or not you are ready for college-level studies or if you'll need a few more preparatory classes.
The Answer is C. Plan for protecting assets . I just took the test
Answer: Yes, the employment contract has been breached, but the non-competition agreement has not been breached.
Explanation:
The options are:
a. Yes, the employment contract has been breached, but the non-competition agreement has not been breached.
b. No, the employment contract has not been breached, but the non-competition agreement has been breached.
c. Yes, both contracts have been breached.
Based on the information given in the question, we can state that the employment contract has been breached. This is because Xuechen signed an employment contract to work as a chef for one of Chicago's best restaurants for a period of three years but she left shortly to work as a manager at another Chicago restaurant. On the other hand, the non-competition agreement has not been breached.
Answer:
Palming off requires proof of the likelihood of confusion,hence B is the correct option.
Explanation:
Palming off is misrepresenting someone else's product as one's.This is an offence that one can be sued for in business law.
For such cases to be acceptable to courts of appropriate jurisdiction,the claimant must proof beyond reasonable that, for instance the defendant's product can be mistaken for his.
For example. a milk product branded as Nikki can be mistaken for another known as Nikke.
Answer:
A and C are correct. Other two are incorrect
Explanation:
