This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is as follows:
Alanis is sitting down after school to examine the research project she has been assigned in her high-school history class. She must first research the reasons behind the Great Depression in American history. Then, she must develop assertions concerning the best way to nurture a nation's economy. Which type of thinking has her teacher asked her to engage in?
A. Inductive reasoning
B. Deductive reasoning
C. Utilizing representativeness heuristics
D. Utilizing availability heuristics
Answer:
The type of thinking she was asked to engage in is:
A. Inductive reasoning
.
Explanation:
<u>When we engage in inductive reasoning, we use premises to reach a conclusion. In other words, we use data that we know to be true or false to draw possible conclusions from.</u> In inductive reasoning, there is room for error. That is, even if all the premises are true, the conclusion we reach can very well be false. In the case explained in the passage, Alanis has been asked to research the reasons behind the Great Depression. The reasons will be her premises. From them, she must draw a conclusion - how to nurture a nation's economy. However, even with the right and true premises, Alanis can still come up with ideas that wouldn't really work to nurture the economy. That is an example of inductive reasoning.
Aloe Vera
Anemone
Catchfly
Answer:
is the fact that the people in this group believe that their behavior is the result of external factors, for instance luck.
Explanation:
Unassuming bias may be defined as the tendency to explain that people's success depends on external factors (such as luck, help received from other people, a certain situation, etc.), and that people's mistakes or failures are the result of their own personal weaknesses.
The correct answer would be, Overconfidence.
Political officials who have no doubt that their own economic and military predictions will come true, most clearly demonstrate Overconfidence.
Explanation:
When people look at a situation with optimistic biased opinion, this is called Overconfidence.
Overconfidence makes people misjudge their opinions, beliefs, abilities, values, assessments, or predictions. People are overconfident about a thing or situation and neglect the actual parameters of the situation.
Overconfident people have more bias towards their own judgement to be true rather than being realistic and accept what actually the fact is.
So political officials usually act overconfident about their predictions regarding the economy and military actions.
Learn more about Overconfidence at:
brainly.com/question/13710905
#LearnWithBrainly
Answer:
Open plains and anywhere with moors
Explanation: