If the Federal Government were able to regulate commerce within a state, there would possibly be a <u>clash of interests</u>.
<h3>
Trade within a
State</h3>
The United States was formed in such a way that there was an internal state government and a federal government that could implement general policies of common application.
Since the federal government has a different view of trade than the state does, an inclusion of the federal government would cause a <u>clash of interests</u> due to the different views among them.
If you want to learn more about Federal Government, you can visit the following link: brainly.com/question/371257
Recognition is the measure of memory used on a test that requires matching terms with correct definitions.
Flexible that's when market conditions change, so do prices. Efficient that's resources are allocated efficiently since price adjust until the maximum number of goods and services are sold. Market driven that's Market forces not government policy determine prices. in effect the system runs itself. Neutral that's when both consumer and producer make choices that determine equilibrium price.
Advertising shapes our consumption patterns by using various
persuasion techniques aimed at triggering certain purchase decisions. For
instance, informational advertising employs rational techniques that appeal to
the consumers’ reason to help them make informed buying decisions. This
information is given under the assumption that it will help the consumer make
an informed decision.
