1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
antoniya [11.8K]
2 years ago
11

2. Which one is not true?

Social Studies
2 answers:
pochemuha2 years ago
6 0
I think the answer is Option C, cause you do have the right to protect yourself, but not harm others on purpose.

Hope this helps :)
Inessa05 [86]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

C.

Explanation:

At least in the USA, everything on that list is true except for C. The second that you infringe on someone else's safety, your rights end. Of course, you can hurt someone in self-defense. If they attacked you first, you have a right to hurt them back because they are not allowed to jeopardize your safety.

You might be interested in
Which lines from the excerpt supports the inference that Romeo is Emotionally conflicted
Citrus2011 [14]

Could you give me an example of the excerpt? Thanks!

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Code of Hammurabi stated that _____________ .
nadya68 [22]

Answer:

c

Explanation:

hope it helps it's correct just use our common sense

6 0
2 years ago
What did the following reformers do during reformation
Phoenix [80]
Reformers protested church corruptions and practices in hopes of reforming Christianity.
7 0
2 years ago
When can a person in a vegetative state be said to exhibit intentional thought?
Maurinko [17]
<span>Patients in a vegetative state are awake, breathe on their own, and seem to go in and out of sleep. But they do not respond to what is happening around them and exhibit no signs of conscious awareness. With communication impossible, friends and family are left wondering if the patients even know they are there.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
What did the Supreme Court find to be unconstitutional under the Abington School District v. Schempp ruling?
cricket20 [7]

Answer:

The Supreme Court ruled Bible reading or any type of prayer unconstitutional.

Explanation:

This is due to separation of Church and State. Considering public schools are state funded, the allowance of religion was found unconstitutional.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • True or False: Congress has the power to levy taxes.
    5·2 answers
  • Cezanne's the basket of apples is full of what appear to be "mistakes" but are actually
    12·1 answer
  • What was stated in the Rome Berlin axis
    11·2 answers
  • Although Regina receives slightly greater rewards from her marriage than her husband, both are satisfied with the relationship b
    6·1 answer
  • When Garbage Project workers investigated alcohol consumption in a sample of Tucson households, they found that the amount of be
    8·1 answer
  • How long did the french and indian war last
    11·2 answers
  • Charleston is the capital of
    5·2 answers
  • The fifty-two-word introduction to the Constitution of the United States is<br> the
    7·1 answer
  • jazzy spends her time at work planning, promoting, and guiding children's experiences at the nature center. in which sector does
    14·1 answer
  • TRUE/FALSE many cross-cultural scholars argue that we can understand and identify abnormality only if we take the cultural conte
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!