Answer for this question is the zeros are greater than -4 and 2
Answer:
x=-16/3 (-5.33)
Step-by-step explanation:
3(x-2)+4x=10(x+1)
3x-6+4x=10x+10
7x-6=10x+10
-6-10=10x-7x
-16=3x
x=-16/3
9514 1404 393
Answer:
19. B -- continued, but modest ...
Step-by-step explanation:
19. There is no decline or decrease indicated on this graph. If growth were exponential, the graph would be concave upward, which it is not. There is continued growth indicated.
__
20. The percentage change from 2005 to 2010 is ...
(60 -20)/20 × 100% = 2 × 100% = 200%
One might compute an average rate of change per year of ...
200%/(5 yr) = 40%/yr
_____
<em>Additional comment</em>
As with any statement of percentage, you need to be very clear about what the base is.
Here, 100% is the number of farms in 2005, so an increase of 40% per year is an increase by 40% of the number in 2005. That is very different from 40% of the number in the previous year, which is how an annual percentage increase is usually interpreted. (The average annual rate of change is closer to 24% with respect to the previous year's number.)
Answer:
2/3
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Our decision rule will be to reject The null hypothesis H0 if the test statistic is less than -1.645, or if it is greater than +1.645.
Step-by-step explanation:
The hypotheses would be;
Null hypothesis;H0: μ = 500
Alternative hypothesis;Ha: μ ≠ 500
Since it's two - tailed at 0.1 level of significance, then each tail will contain 5% or 0.05. From the z-table attached, the corresponding critical value of 0.05 is approximately 1.645 standard deviations from the mean.
Thus, our decision rule will be to reject The null hypothesis H0 if the test statistic is less than -1.645, or if it is greater than +1.645.
