1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
11111nata11111 [884]
3 years ago
7

Put brackets in the following to make it correct5-2x2+2x7-5

Mathematics
1 answer:
gayaneshka [121]3 years ago
5 0
2.2=4 2.7=14 5-4+14-5=1+14-5=15-5=10 Good Luck!
You might be interested in
Given the following information about glucose levels (in milligrams of glucose per 100 milliliters of blood.) ( from 9.5)
Svetllana [295]

Answer:

A. 16.385

B. 9.532

C. (16.358)^2 is different from (9.532)^2

a. sigma squared of non pregnant women is GREATER THAN sigma squared of pregnant women

Step-by-step explanation:

<h3>A and B. Standard Deviation 's' of both columns:</h3>

The formula for the standard deviation is:

s = √(∑(x - μ)²/(n))

where,

∑ = is the sum function

x = a number from the set

μ  = mean of the set

n =  is the amount of the numbers in the set.

the column of non-pregnant women is

[73, 61, 104, 75, 85, 65, 62, 98, 92, 106]

  • first find the mean of this set:

mean = μ  = (sum of all the numbers)/(amount of numbers)

μ = [73 + 61 + 104 +75 + 85 + 65 + 62 + 98 + 92 + 106]/(10)

μ = 821/10

μ = 82.1

similarly, for pregnant women the mean is

μ = 80.125

  • now, to find the standard deviation 's', first we need to find the variance 's²'. So, what you have to do is subtract each value in the column with the mean 'μ' and square the result.

for non-pregnant you will get:

[ 82.81, 445.21, 479.61,  50.41,   8.41, 292.41, 404.01, 252.81,  98.01, 571.21]

for pregnant you will get:

[ 66.015,  15.015,  97.515, 221.265, 199.51,  102.515,   1.265,  23.76]

  • finally just sum all the numbers of a column and divide with the amount of numbers in that column (remember that col1 has 10 numbers and col2 has 8 numbers). And you will get your variance for both pregnant and non-pregnant women:

for non-pregnant = 2684.89/10

non-pregnant = 268.4 (this is the variance and it is denoted by s²)

for standard deviation 's', just take the square root of the variance

\sqrt{268.4} = 16.385.

similarly standard deviation of pregnant women can be found to be:

\sqrt{90.859} = 9.532.

A. non-pregnant 'S' =  16.385

B. pregnant 'S' = 9.532

<h3>C. CLAIM:</h3>

you only have to show whether the variance of the above two columns are different or not.

And YES, the variances of the two column are indeed different, hence you make the CLAIM as written in question(C)

<h3>Multiple Choice:</h3>

here you need to show how different are the two values:

recall the variances:

Column1 = 268.4 (non-pregnant)

Column2 = 9.532 (pregnant)

now you know that the variance of non-pregnant is GREATER THAN the variance of pregnant

3 0
4 years ago
Manny and Susan have an egg carton full of eggs to use for their science project. Manny uses 1/3 of the eggs and Susan uses 1/2
djyliett [7]
This is asking you to add both fractions.
You would start with 1/2 and add 1/3.
1/2 + 1/3 = 5/6

The answer is 5/6.
8 0
2 years ago
What additional information do you need to prove △ABC ≅ △DEF by the SSS Postulate?
Fudgin [204]
The answer to this question is answer choice C.

For the SSS postulate, we need 3 pairs of congruent sides. However, in the image, there are only 2 pairs. 

The missing pair in the image is AC and DF. If those are congruent, the triangle can be proven congruent by the SSS postulate.

Hope this helps! :)

~AgentCozmo4, Junior Moderator
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
NEED HELP WILL MARK BRAINLIEST
Molodets [167]

Step 2 was his error.

The following problem is solved by Alan:

\frac{x}{200} =\frac{8}{25}

In solving for x, you have to cross multiply between the numbers.

In that case, step 2 would look like this:

(25)(x) = (8)(200)

NOT THIS:

(8)(x) = (25)(200)

Now continue all the way.

25x = 1600

x = 1600 ÷ 25

x = 64

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
4(x+5)+4x+8
kvasek [131]
B.) 8(x+4) is the best choice
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • suppose you spina spinner numbered 1 through 6, and you sa 3 five times in a row.What is the theoretical possibility of spinning
    12·1 answer
  • How do I find the perimeter of the shapes
    9·1 answer
  • 55745 nearest thousand
    9·1 answer
  • 2<br> Scott said that 0.09 was a bigger number than 0.1. Use powers of 10 to show that he is wrong
    8·1 answer
  • What is the slope of the line that passes through the points (8, 1) and (5, 7)?
    8·1 answer
  • How long would it take to travel 315 mi at the rate of 45 mi/h mi/h ?
    14·2 answers
  • 1) Seven less than twice a number, n, is 32.
    15·2 answers
  • Can someone help i have several questions like this i also need the work shown
    10·1 answer
  • What (7 1/3) - (2 2/3) = pls help.
    11·2 answers
  • You make $5000 per morth. If you spend 50% on necessitles, 30% on stuff you want and 20% of it you end up saving, how much money
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!