Answer:
p = 0.07
p-hat = 0.035
p0 = 0.07
p-value = 0.003
Step-by-step explanation:
p = population parameter, in this case, the rate of infestations across all trees in the forest
p-hat = test statistic, in this case, the rate of infestations found in the sample of trees, i.e. those in Doug's backyard
p0 = the null hypothesis, in this case, the rate of infestations within the forest is correctly evaluated at 0.07 or 7%
p-value = the likelihood any difference between p and p-hat is down to chance
In this case 0.003 as the p-value means there is only 0.3% probability of our statistic value of 0.035 being down to variability and chance meaning it is 99.7% likely that there is some reason behind this difference;
We would accept the alternative hypothesis which says the current parameter value, 0.07, is in fact incorrect (either too high or too low, in this case, likely too high).
The original side length was 12m therefore the perimeter was 36m. 12/4 is 3 so the perimeter is now 9, and the difference between them is 27.
Answer:
A 29 is the answer to the problem
Answer:
hey im not actually here to help you, i just need points. thanks for the points
Step-by-step explanation:
