The CPU is capable of understanding binary machine language instructions. This assertion is True.
Machine language, also known as machine code or object code, is a set of binary digits or bits that the computer reads and decodes. The only language that a computer can comprehend is machine language.
Depending on the operating system, a program's or action's precise machine language can change. The way a compiler converts a program or action into machine language is determined by the particular operating system. One or more programming languages, such as C++, Java, or Visual Basic, are used to create computer programs. The source code for computer programs must be compiled since a computer cannot understand the programming languages used to generate them directly.
Once a program's code has been compiled, it has been converted into machine language, which the computer can understand.
To learn more about binary machine language here
brainly.com/question/28314659
#SPJ4
Answer:
I think that the overall theme of this is being strong and not giving up.
Explanation:
I have not read the novel and would like you to try and search this up to find some ideas to work off of
Answer:
... John recieve a major setback.
It becomes hard for him to accept the fact that the promotion he worked so hard for, was handed over to a new employee.
He started feeling cheated by his own organisation. This in return affected his performance too.
From being a top performer, he straightaway joined the likes of the end names in the list.
He decided to talk about it rather than staying quite.
He fixes a meeting with the top leadership and put forward his point.
To his surprise he found that the management was waiting for him to respond so they could check if he had the ability and strength to stand against the wrong.
He found that the new employee hired was to be his team mate after promotion.
He got his deserved promotion and was once again on his way to success.
<em>Please</em><em> </em><em>mark</em><em> it</em><em> as</em><em> <u>brainliest</u></em><em>. </em><em>Follow</em><em> </em><em>me</em><em> </em><em>I </em><em>will</em><em> </em><em>follow </em><em>back</em><em>. </em><em /><em /><em /><em /><em /><em />
Answer:
The subject-verb agreement is wrong. The correct sentence would be:
- Excitement between the two groups has risen after the election.
Explanation:
<u>If we ask the verb a simple question, we can find the subject: "What has risen after the election? Excitement between the two groups." Even though the answer is long, the simple subject itself is comprised of just one singular word: "excitement". This is the most important word, the one to which the verb refers. We can even remove the words that come after it, and the effect or meaning will be the same: "Excitement has risen after the election."</u>
The problem with "Excitement between the two groups have risen after the election" is that "have" is agreeing with "groups". However, as seen above, "groups" is not the most important word in the subject. Therefore, the verb should not agree with it.
Answer:
Ad hominem attack
Explanation:
A logical fallacy is a flaw in reasoning.
Ad hominem (literally translated as <em>to the person</em>) is a type of logical fallacy in which a person criticizes or attacks another person, rather than what they are saying. Here, the speaker doesn't critize the mentioned poem. They don't give explanations about why the poem is not good. They simply attack the writer, stating that they are a sick and morbid person. That is not a valid reason as to why someone shouldn't read a poem.
