Answer:
The answer is: social role theory.
Explanation:
Harry's beliefs and expectations about the responsibilities of men can best be explained by the social role theory. This theory, developed by psychologist Alice Eagly in the 1980s, argues that gender stereotypes are a consequence of the division of labor, which stated that men were more fit and prepared to perform jobs in the public world -in politics, army, security, etc. And confined women to the private world of the household, or in jobs related to the service and care of others -in education, nursing, cleaning, etc.
This division of labor is based in the belief that men and women have different physical and mental capacities, therefore, they can only perform the tasks and jobs asigned to their gender. According to social role theory, gender stereotypes derived from the division of labor are still present to this day, which is why Harry believes that men have the responsibility to defend their country, being braver and stronger than women.
What are the reasons? Please show us the multiple choice answers that we could choose from that way we can help!
Sociologists examine social phenomena in order to learn more about social phenomena affect people's lives.
Social phenomena are taken into consideration as inclusive of all conduct which impacts or is inspired through organism sufficiently alive to reply to each other. This includes impacts from beyond generations.
Social phenomenon. Any discovered motion, occasion, or state of affairs this is created through society, in preference to such that takes place naturally. person elements. organic and private elements that influence our conduct.
Social phenomena are taken into consideration as inclusive of all conduct which impacts or is stimulated by means of organisms sufficiently alive to respond to each other. This includes impacts from past generations.
Learn more about sociologists here:-brainly.com/question/606515
#SPJ4
Answer:
One of the most common criticisms of Stanley Milgram’s studies of obedience is that the results of his experiment do not represent actual tendencies to obey the authority due to the participants of it probably knowing everything was okay, another example is that it has been considered in an unethical study in which he had lied to the respondents.
Explanation:
