C. emotional stability.
A. Agreeableness is what it sounds like... Willing to be agreeable... Willing to agree.
B. Conscientiousness is also what it sounds like...to be conscious of what's going on around you and within you (external and internal locus of control).
D. Disposition is how you view things...how you "valence" something (valence means to label something as positive or negative); your response in context to disposition is usually stable and predictable over time.
E. Extraversion basically just refers to how social or outgoing you are.
Even though emotional stability is the correct answer, it's important to understand emotional stability (aka emotional regulation) is on a scale. We all feel angry, anxious, depressed, emotional, insecure, and excitable multiple times in our lives. These are normal human emotions! However, in psychology, we start to call it "abnormal", or say there's a "lack of emotional regulation/stability" when these types of negatively valenced emotions are pervasive in everyday life. This is why the question specifies "the DEGREE to which".
Hope this helps!
The correct answer is:<u>D.Mr.Dussel is fussy and argues with everyone while Mr.Frank is even tempered and eager for peace in the Annex.</u>
<u>I am 100% sure that this is the correct answer just took the test and got this correct.</u>
<u></u>
<u>Hope this helps pls mark brainliest when you get a chance!:)</u>
Matt and Kim will meet one another at the movies I hope that it makes sense to you
Answer:
George Washington was a man of extraordinary charisma and talent for leadership. The populace admired and respected him; his fellow soliders and officials did, too; he had dealings with outstanding people of his time who stood higher than he did intellectually level. Nevertheless, he was the leader.
According to a paper by reverend Richard C. Stazesky for the George Washington Club (2000) in Delaware , Washington´s leadership style shows the following characteristics:
- he had a vision of the cause that comprised ideas and goals that would not be changed no matter the circumstances;
- he was skillful in designing and creating an organizational culture that made possible the achievement of the leader´s vision and ideas;
- he was successful in gaining others for the cause by persuading them and by instilling in them his ideas, beliefs and values of his vision.
- as any other successful leader, he effectively combined in himself different roles to be played for the cause.
Explanation:
