Answer:
a. discharged.
Explanation:
Based on the scenario it can be said that after the court order, O’Reilly’s contract with Planners & Builders is officially discharged. In the context of the law, a discharged contract is a contract or agreement that has been terminated or made null. This can happen due to many reasons, such as fulfillment of a contract, inability to fulfill one parties duties, Bankruptcy, etc. In this case it was due to a court order.
Answer:
Competition
Explanation:
In the capitalistic economy, COMPETITION ensures that a firm will survive only if it serves its customers well by providing products and services that meet their needs.
Hence, Competition is a favorable concept for business because it stimulates the improvement and growth of new and decent commodities in the markets.
To consumers, competition is good because it normally leads to better service and lower the costs or prices of commodities.
When electrical or magnetic interference is present
It can be noted that when the addition of more features to an existing product overwhelm the customers, it is known as feature fatigue.
<h3>What is feature fatigue?</h3>
Feature fatigue simply means when consumers shy away from products that appear to be rich in features.
This occurs ehen a company continually adds more features to an existing product to try to appeal to more customers may end up overwhelming customers and create an unintended consequence.
Learn more about fatigue on:
brainly.com/question/948124
Answer:
D) The extra energy benefits Patrick gets from another can are no longer worth the cost. MB/MC (S)
Explanation:
The optimal quantity for Patrick to consume is 5 cans of GreenCow.
This is the quantity where MARGINAL BENEFIT EQUALS MARGINAL COST. For all quantities up to the 5th, the marginal benefit is higher than the marginal cost. This means that Patrick's net benefit is increasing, and consuming all units up to this point make him better off.
If Patrick were to consume any more than 5 cans of GreenCow, the cost of each additional can would be higher than the additional benefit (because the marginal cost curve is higher than the marginal benefit curve). Consuming any cans beyond the 5th, therefore, makes him worse off.
