Sometime in the mid-1970s the term peace process became widely used to describe the American-led efforts to bring about a negotiated peace between Israel and its neighbors. The phrase stuck, and ever since it has been synonymous with the gradual, step-by-step approach to resolving one of the world's most difficult conflicts. In the years since 1967<span> the emphasis in Washington has shifted from the spelling out of the ingredients of "peace" to the "process" of getting there. … Much of US constitutional theory focuses on how issues should be resolved – the process – rather than on substance – what should be done. … The United States has provided both a sense of direction and a mechanism. That, at its best, is what the peace process has been about. At worst, it has been little more than a slogan used to mask the marking of time.</span><span>[2]</span>
Answer:
B. Bland
Explanation:
sweet, salty, and bitter are all taste sensations.
The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by your question is the third choice or letter C. The third choice states that "<span>Spanish friars most likely traveled to Georgia and the barrier island because they wanted to convert Native Americans." I hope it has come to your help.</span>
Answer:he can help his audience understand the concept further by defining example
Explanation:
An example explains and support your speech because people can actually grasp what you are talking about if you can give them examples otherwise your speech becomes an idea they can only understand in words but can not put into action or see practically.
Examples give weight to your speech cause it can grasp people's attention as they start to practically see what you are talking about.
