1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
drek231 [11]
3 years ago
5

Expand and simplify : 3(2x+1)+2(x+3)

Mathematics
1 answer:
kolezko [41]3 years ago
4 0
I think is 8x+9 because i was trying to simplify-it and it keep coming out that
You might be interested in
How To Solve To Get The Answer For <br> P=3x+10n+9/3,for x
Iteru [2.4K]
The full solution is attached below.

Mark as brainliest if this helped! :)

5 0
3 years ago
Rodent has two 7-foot-long pipes he needs to cut them into pieces that are 15 inches each what is the greatest number of 15 inch
Mice21 [21]
12 inch=1 ft
7 x 12=84 inches
84/15=5.6, so he can cut 5 , 15 inch piecs with .6 left over.
4 0
3 years ago
National Ave gas prices
Musya8 [376]
Question: What equation models the data?
For this question I used a software to calculate the equation. When plotted, we can notice that the points form a parabolic function therefore we needed quadratic regression for this one. The quadratic equation is in the form of y=A+Bx+Cx^{2} where y represents the gas prices, x is the year, and A, B, and C are coefficients. I have found A, B, and C using the software and the equation for the data is:

y=-0.092+0.587x-0.026x^{2}

Question: What are the domain and range of the equation?
To find the range of the equation, we just transform the quadratic equation into the form y=a(x-h)^{2}+k. The value for k would be the maximum element in our range, and for the sake of the problem, let's assume that we don't have negative prices.

y=-0.092+0.587x-0.026x^{2}
y+0.092=0.587x-0.026x^{2}
y+0.092=-0.026(x^{2}-22.577x)
y+0.092-0.026(127.442)=-0.026(x^{2}-22.577x+127.442)
y-3.221=-0.026(x-11.289)^{2}
y=-0.026(x-11.289)^{2}+3.221

We can see that 3.221 is the maximum value of the range while zero is the minimum. Thus, we can express the range as {y|0 \leq y \leq 3.221}

For the domain, the number of years can extend infinitely but it will also depend if we want to consider the years where the price will be negative. Thus, let's just find the year when the price would be zero.

0=-0.026(x-11.289)^{2}+3.221
-3.221=-0.026(x-11.289)^{2}
123.885=(x-11.289)^{2}
+-11.130=x-11.289

x=0.159
x=22.419

Anywhere before and after the range of the x values above would result to a negative price therefore we can restrict the domain to those values. However, since x represents the year, we would need to round up the first value and round down the larger value.

Domain: {x|01 \leq x \leq 22}

Question: Do you think your equation is a good fit for the data?
To know whether our equation is a good fit or not, we just look at the value of the correlation coefficient r. We can calculate this manually but in this case I just used a software. According to the software, the value for r is 0.661. This is almost close to a strong correlation which is 0.7 thus we can say that this equation is a good fit.

Question: Is there a trend in the data?
There might be a trend, but it won't be a simple linear one. Since the data initially rose before continuously decreasing, our data would best be described by a quadratic trend. The quadratic trend would be the parabolic equation we just used to model the data.

Question: Does there seem to be a positive correlation, a negative correlation, or neither?
Neither. A positive or negative correlation only applies when we are talking about linear trends, where it's either one variable increases as the other one also increases or the variable decreases as the other one increases. In our case, the price rose and fall as the years increase so there is neither a positive nor a negative correlation.

Question: How much do you expect gas to cost in 2020?
We can answer this question by using the equation that we used to model the data. For this question, we would just need to substitute 20 for x since we want to know the price in 2020 (we have only used the last two digits of the year for the equation) while the answer to this would be the expected price.

y=-0.092+0.587(20)-0.026(20)^{2}
y=-0.092+11.740-10.400
y=1.248

The expected price in 2020 would be 1.248 units.
4 0
4 years ago
For 3 and 4 find the slope of the line that passes through the given points
maks197457 [2]
Attach a picture for the question
5 0
4 years ago
Kate already owns 22 necklaces, and additional necklaces are priced at 2 for a dollar. With
egoroff_w [7]

Answer:

48

Step-by-step explanation:

If she already has 22 and she can buy 2 for $1 and she has $13, multiply 2 by 13 to get how many she can buy, or 26. Then add the amount she already owns to how many she can buy to get how many she can own, or 48.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The sum of 5 and -10 decreased by 4
    14·1 answer
  • What points names the ordered -4 -2
    9·1 answer
  • If f(x)=6 and g(x)=4x+1, find (fog)(x)
    14·1 answer
  • A farmer harvested 21 1 4​ fewer bushels of sweet corn this year than the previous year. If the farmer's sweet corn crop is plan
    10·1 answer
  • Math homework pls help
    11·1 answer
  • An industrial/organizational psychologist is consulting with Family Practice Pediatrics, which has just lost several of its best
    6·1 answer
  • Whoever answers first, I will give Brainliest! :)
    8·1 answer
  • What is the measure of ABC?
    8·1 answer
  • Help please somebody
    5·1 answer
  • Express
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!