From the 1340s to the nineteenth century, barring two brief interims during the 1360s and the 1420s, the lords and rulers of England (and, later, of Great Britain) likewise guaranteed the position of the royalty of France. The case dates from Edward III, who guaranteed the French position of royalty in 1340 as the sororal nephew of the last immediate Capetian, Charles IV. Edward and his beneficiaries battled the Hundred Years' War to implement this case and were quickly fruitful during the 1420s under Henry V and Henry VI, yet the House of Valois, a cadet part of the Capetian tradition, was, at last, successful and held control of France. Regardless of this, English and British rulers proceeded to unmistakably call themselves rulers of France and the French fleur-de-lys were incorporated into the regal arms. This proceeded until 1801, by which time France never again had any ruler, having turned into a republic. The Jacobite petitioners, in any case, did not unequivocally surrender the case.
Gold,spices,slaves hope i helped
Lets say that there are 5 people in a room and their ages are: 2,4,4,16,18
The range is the distribution of values: here it's from 2 to 18.
the mode is the correct answer! here it's 4.
the mean is the average: here it' s 22
the median is 4: the middle value.
Among all the statements, the statement which would most likely be made by an opponent of affirmative action or positive action is that each person (regardless of caste, region, sex and colour) should be judged as an individual without taking anyone else into consideration.
The laws and policies supporting Affirmative Action seek to find ways to bring equality and opportunities, with the intention of correcting any disadvantage that people had in the past.
If someone doesn't agree with this initiative, they might consider that all should be evaluated without taking such measures of compensation.
