<u>Answer:
</u>
The research paper titled 'Incorporation of Environmental Factors in Stock Assessments: Just Because We Can, When Should We' was presented by multiple authors and co-authors at the 145th annual meeting of the American Fisheries Society held at Portland, Oregon in 2015.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The research paper talks about the attempts made by the Society at incorporating various environmental factors in the practices of fishing in order to move towards sustainability.
- It emphasizes the successes of these attempts and calls for more varied and in-depth incorporation of sustainable environmental practices by suggesting possible practices in the discipline.
- The success of practices like the development of sustainable mechanism has been highlighted in the paper.
Answer:
Women's rights have historically been restricted by the Supreme Court using the reasonableness standard.
Explanation:
The reasonableness standard is used in US courts to understand whether a plaintiff or defendant acted reasonably in a harassment situation, for example, and it has been used in cases against police where the plaintiff claims excessive violence was used. There is also the "reasonable woman standard" that has been used in US Supreme Court Cases like Harris vs. Forklift Systems 510 US 17 (1993). The Supreme Court sided in favor of Harris who had to appeal two lower court decisions that found that Harris was not sufficiently psychologically impacted for the case to constitute harassment. The reasonableness standard can be seen as limiting because it imposes the standards of what men find reasonable in a sexual situation and coworker relationship at the expense of what women may find uncomfortable or inappropriate.
<span>It does not allow the government to handle the important needs such as common currency or taxes on trade goods. Not to mention that because of their Articles of Confederation they cannot elect a chief executive or one official leader</span>
Hello there!
<span>When playing games of chance like slot machines or roulette, people often say that a particular outcome is "due," implying that one outcome is more likely because it hasn't happened in a while. this is a fallacy because in these examples the outcome of each trial is: Independent
Games or chance are random in nature. That is, the outcomes are influenced not by the previous outcome, but by probabilistic statistics. In slot machines or roulette, the outcome of each trial is Independent, meaning that it isn't influenced by any previous trial and that if an outcome doesn't happen in a while, it will not increase the chances that it will happen in the next trial.
</span>
Answer:
True
Explanation:
That the answer Plss follow me thanks
